English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-19 17:04:28 · 31 answers · asked by Eyota Xin 3 in Politics & Government Politics

*ON* instigating World War 3....

2007-01-19 17:06:02 · update #1

The Americans are building up a significant naval presence to istigate Iran....

2007-01-19 17:09:46 · update #2

Iraq didnt attack you....

2007-01-19 17:11:13 · update #3

I'm not European
I'm Singaporean

2007-01-19 17:11:56 · update #4

Singapore is not being attacked because we are not sticking our nose in every other countries business.

We are not imposing our will at the end of a gun like you.
We are not saying live our way with our form of democracy or we will force you too

like you!!

2007-01-19 17:36:25 · update #5

Unfortunately the evil the United States spreads is getting answered and its repercussions will affect the entire world.

2007-01-19 17:37:52 · update #6

Your Government I mean not the American people.
Most of the American people I have met over here are good people.

2007-01-19 17:39:25 · update #7

31 answers

We are already engaged in WWIII, but no one wants to call it that.

2007-01-19 17:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by Sassy 2 · 4 4

I don't know.... probably something you did. I'm not saying you should feel bad or guilty, but... you should feel bad and guilty.
States generally try to maintain the status-quo. After 9/11 the US made a policy choice that the status-quo is what allowed terrorism to expand. I can absolutely understand why people from other countries may be nervous or even upset by US policy. The one thing I would ask that they consider, is that states interact based on their strategic position. As the dominant power, the US behaves as one. I think it useful to ask ourselves if the global dynamics remained the same and the only difference was in the preeminant power, would we expect far different behavior? Highly doubtful. If we acknowledge the behaviors in history, the US is acting as hegemons act. If they had the means, other countries would act the same.

2007-01-19 17:20:11 · answer #2 · answered by Mark P 5 · 0 2

i apologize to you for any personal attacks anyone on here has made. Some people don't have the capacity to have a civil conversation. however, we did not start it AL-quida did on 9/11. And yes Iraq did attack us. Prior to invasion, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France had been engaged in a low-level conflict with Iraq, by enforcing the two Iraqi no-fly zones in the north and the south of the country. These zones were created following the Persian Gulf War. Iraqi air-defense installations repeatedly targeted American and British air patrols and were often engaged by the coalition aircraft shortly afterwords. in June of 2002. The United States and its allies carried out military strikes against Iraqi targets after being fired on by Iraqi anti-aircraft installations. In retaliation for the Iraqi's now-daily air defense attacks on coalition aircraft, the September attacks included a 5 September 100-aircraft attack on the main air defense site in western Iraq.

2007-01-19 17:33:24 · answer #3 · answered by nick w 2 · 3 2

COZ:
American are so brainwashed to believe that they are PREVENTING Armageddon by shielding Israel from IRAQ, SYRIA and IRAN.. little they know they are actually anticipating Armageddon by their moronic policies based on charlatanism and total ignorance to history ...

Here is a link that will give some clues why Americans are so way off reality (in particular Evangelists of Pat Robertson and co.) :
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/wolzek/HistoryofOurWorld.html

2007-01-19 17:41:23 · answer #4 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 2 1

In my opinion America has stepped in to help many nations not to instigate.......

My Father was a British Japanese Prisoner of War for 4 years . he was captured in Singapore ,and I thank God (America poked their nose in )as you call it .He was tortured but yet he tells me not half as bad as the Americans who came through the Batan Walk, with that and what I have heard from WW11 American Servicemen. MOST COUNTRIES SHOULD BE THANKFUL FOR AMERICA AND THEIR ONGOING SUPPORT.......

2007-01-19 18:01:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Hm, that's not really something new. Though I like using roman numerals when I talk about any of the World Wars.
Anyways.
I don't think the U.S. (remember, America is a continent) is eager to instigate World War III. Even with the consequences of war with Iran and the U.S. is putting more naval forces in the Persian Gulf. You have to know that Iran isn't as friendly as it should be as it is imminent that it is producing nuclear weapons.
U.S. claims Iran is creating nuclear components that are going to go for enriching uranium, only use is weapons. Iran denies it. Once U.S. shown considerable proof of Iran's secret nuclear program. Iran claims it was only peaceful and not used for any nuclear weapons. U.S. gets concerned. U.S. has offered funding and help to Iran for a peaceful, non-weapon related nuclear program in exchange that they don't go ahead with a nuclear weapons program. Iran denied it. Iran's president has called for the irradiation of Israel, Israel is only a hour's drive at it's thinnest border, enough to be destroyed with a nuclear warhead. Iran's president has time after time shown many anti-Semitic attitudes openly. Iran has many anti-Israel propaganda, all leading to actual hatred of Jewish people. Such propaganda draws attention from current domestic problems of human rights violations and economical issues in Iran to foreign countries. Moving most of the country to want Israel to be destroyed and annihilated.
So, all in all, Iran is posing to take out Israel from the face of the planet. And they seem to want to use nuclear weapons to do so. Especially when the president believes a Islamic version of Jesus would come and that the history of the world would end in a couple of years. Religious backing to someone's train of though is dangerous if violent means is seen as the only way.

2007-01-19 17:31:58 · answer #6 · answered by Eh? 2 · 2 2

To think people, especially the president would make you considered a radical, unintelligent moron that spends there time thinking of stupid things like this.

If a world war happens, it happens, events lead to events, and the terrorists are the ones that misguide their people into changing those events into violent ones, like a world war. They have misinterperted everything the Americans have done since they have bombed our nation without reason, only prejudice.

Saying the president (which is what you meant) is eager to start a world war is rediculous.

What do they teach you in Singapore? Or have you been talking to to many dem's lately?

2007-01-19 17:27:11 · answer #7 · answered by Corey 4 · 2 3

Well there is the President, the government, but individual people here in America aren't responsible for what our country does. I am not bent on bringing on a war. I want peace.

2007-01-19 17:36:16 · answer #8 · answered by nile queen 1 · 1 1

WWIII began on 9-11-01 when the US was attacked by islamic fascists who hijacked commercial airplanes and murdered the passengers and an additional 3,000 human beings in buildings.

Iraq did not attack us. True. Neither did Germany or Italy in WWII, but their ally - Japan - did and they declared war on us. Had we not stepped in, your little country of Singapore would be speaking a mixture of Japanese and German. Well, of course the 3rd Reich had no use for anyone not Aryan, so you'd be history.

Saddam had every intention of acquiring wmd and using them on his many enemies, just as he did the Kurds.
Iran and North Korea are dictatorships run by mental midgets with an agenda. That agenda includes hacking off your head if you do not bow to them.

Everyone hates America because we have the courage to face these menaces to humanity. All the while we are hated, we hand out money to the eager hands of those who hate us.

2007-01-19 17:21:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

Um...there is no way this is going to be as big as a world war. I suggest you get down ALL the facts before you start accusing. Or else, mind your own Singaporean business.

2007-01-19 17:41:39 · answer #10 · answered by Picard Facepalm 5 · 3 1

WW 111 will be fought with nuclear weapons. The Doomsday Clock has been moved up to 5 to 12 to apocalypse, by scientists and physicists who keep track of nuclear threats the world over.
Who is going to instigate who remains to be seen, just before we all die.

2007-01-19 17:27:30 · answer #11 · answered by flamingo 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers