English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

them beeing ousted by dictators sponsored by the US?

2007-01-19 16:30:37 · 18 answers · asked by BOLÍVAR Libertador de América 1 in Politics & Government Politics

I ask you leave us alone.

2007-01-19 16:34:54 · update #1

18 answers

The Answer to that is: It all comes down to money with the US government. The people have a hard time keeping track of whats really going on with the media and everything else.

And the correct way to say that is: Why does it bother the United States so much that now Latin Americans can choose their leaders without them being ousted by dictators sponsored by the US.?

2007-01-19 16:37:07 · answer #1 · answered by ☺☻☺☻☺☻ 6 · 1 7

The U.S. doesn't, it hasn't done much in Latin America for sometime. And I do agree that during the Cold War, supporting dictators in South America was a bad decision, just like the Middle East. Though it was a time of global panic and anxiety, where the U.S. really wanted countries to pledge support to the U.S. than to the Soviets who were doing well in South America since the idea of communism was appealing to the conditions and social and economical injustice that was in those countries then.

2007-01-19 16:55:22 · answer #2 · answered by Eh? 2 · 1 0

Why does everyone from Latin America think the U.S. gives a moldy sheep turd about what goes on down there? If we were overly concerned about what Latin America (or South America, for that matter) thought, we'd have popped that windbag from Venezuela (Chavez) a long time ago. Nobody here cares about who you pick as your leaders. When they take advantage of you and run your countries into the ground, we don't want to hear about it.

2007-01-19 16:44:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The majority of people in the United States agree with you. Unfortunately at the moment, we have a problem a lot of people in Latin America are alll too familier with--leaders who are greedy, power-hungry, and who ignore the people. Decent epople here don't like it eaither-and we are putting things to rights. But it does take time.

Or to put it another way--you don't think Bush really means his statements about spreading democracy, do you? As far as he and his cabal are concerned, that's jsut propaganda--the last thing they want is democracy--here or anywhere else. No profit in it for them.

2007-01-19 18:50:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It doesn't bother the US how you choose your leaders as far as I know. Maybe some do but I don't think the average American knows anything about it or cares. Why are you so against us. Like what did I as an American do to you?

2007-01-19 17:17:17 · answer #5 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1 0

Can choose their own leaders???!!! What the hell do you call the election in Peru? Humalla had to back away from Chavez because of how hard Chavez was pushing him.
The US supports candidates that match our interests, but don't presume that we are alone in this.

2007-01-19 17:41:46 · answer #6 · answered by Mark P 5 · 1 0

It doesn't bother me a bit, but tell the people of these countries that "voted" for these leaders to stay in their countries and deal with their own problems.

2007-01-19 16:34:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Tell your countrymen to stay on their side as well. Last time i checked Americans aren't jumping the border to live your country.

2007-01-19 21:00:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's not the people, it's the ruling corporate oligarchy who are bothered by it.
Loss of a fascist puppet seriously cuts into their profits.

2007-01-19 18:34:04 · answer #9 · answered by Mighty_Mezz 1 · 0 1

It doesn't bother me....but the US does tend to stick their nose where it doesn't belong. The US has been manipulating Latin America for a long time...Nothing has ever been gained with these CIA trained puppets.

2007-01-19 16:41:45 · answer #10 · answered by Frann 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers