Now that the match between Andy and Marat is over........that Andy might have a chance to win this whole thing? (Australian Open) I watched the entire battle and it was great entertainment. Andy has improved quite a bit now that he has Jimmy Connors as his coach. I haven't watched Andy for a while because he choked so much and made so many terrible mistakes and it just made me mad, but I was pleasantly surprised today. Marat was great, also, & he also has a new coach. Now that they are reinventing themselves, are they up-and-comers??? Tennis surely needs some new twists and turns.
2007-01-19 15:33:22 · 5 answers · asked by cola 5 in Sports ➔ Tennis
NO!.......and...........NO!
The best returner in the game and perhaps the best ever is.....
Yes....that's right.....Roger Federer!
AGHHHH!
Tired of hearing his name aren't you! Well get used to it!!!!
The reason why Fed will beat Andy is because of his ability to get more balls in play on Roddick's serve. Look at the stats....On several occasions Federer has played Andy and served more aces than Connors' young challenger! And as nice as it is to see Andy coming to the net remember one thing...."who has the best anticipation and the best passing game in all of tennis?"
......Yes that's right again!...........Roger Federer!
You see the twist is, is that Federer is making everyone else better! Looking for new coaching and getting in better shape, improving their serves are just evident of the pressure Federer's incredibly complete game has put on these athletes to improve!
Up and comers....No! Roddick over Federer....NO!
Twist and turns.........OH YEAH!!!!!!
2007-01-20 04:49:18 · answer #1 · answered by CSnumber1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey i watched this match too,and it was just too good and really entertaining with all the arguements safin had with the umpire.i agree with u roddick has improved like hell under connors and was playing pretty good except in the middle when he was hitting many unforced errors.he is in really good form and even defeated federer at the kooyong classic so i think he has a good chance of winning if he is able to defeat federer.i personally was supporting safin and was pretty sad that he lost.but as of now i think safin needs to put in a bit of work as far as his groundstrokes were concerned cos he was making a lot of unforced errors.i would really like some new twists and turns,but since i am a nadal supporter i would like that he is not defeated though federer can lose cos he just wins all the time.
2007-01-20 03:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by suvs 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would also like that some new twist happen in this year's Australian Open, but I think that is just not possible, at least not yet. Although Roddick has improved himself, he still isn't capable of beating Roger Federer in such as important game.
2007-01-20 03:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by Jovan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i DO believe that andy can win he just has to keep playing like he did yesterday
2007-01-20 00:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by Martin 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he could win the whole thing
2007-01-20 14:15:49 · answer #5 · answered by Someone in Tennessee 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋