If you were in a killer natural disaster, would you want to be the first or last to go?
2007-01-19 14:53:16 · 9 answers · asked by jeff v 1 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
First. I'd have to die anyways so just get it over with.
2007-01-19 15:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by just wants to know 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Does it matter? I guess I'd rather be one of the latter dudes to go. Maybe I could help someone survive before I checked out. Maybe I could help my family. Maybe I could do some sort of good. So, I would rather go later.
2007-01-19 22:57:32 · answer #2 · answered by spookguy99 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The last - I intend to cling to life until the bitter end. I think it would be pretty horrible to see all around you people dying, but I think my will to survive would carry me through and maybe enable me to help a few others.
2007-01-19 22:56:53 · answer #3 · answered by bugged to death 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
last for then I knew there was no one else to help through the disaster...
2007-01-19 23:00:51 · answer #4 · answered by Cherish B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first
2007-01-19 23:19:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hard to say i would want to be there for my children but wouldnt want to see them harmed. So i prefer we go at the exact same time.
2007-01-19 22:57:17 · answer #6 · answered by troys_wifey2003 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The last to go would be more memorable
2007-01-19 23:04:43 · answer #7 · answered by ♨ Wisper ► 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Last, it would make for a good story in heaven.
2007-01-19 22:56:05 · answer #8 · answered by I do what I want.. 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL=individually or one at a time?
2007-01-19 23:03:44 · answer #9 · answered by bev 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋