Are life, liberty and property the most fundamental rights of mankind? If not, what supercedes these rights? If so, is Socialism in violation of these rights?
2007-01-19 13:35:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Life and liberty (aka freedom) are fundamental. The right to property; no. I don't feel that Socialism violates the rights to life & liberty.
2007-01-19 13:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Define mankind. Any rights inherent in a 'human being' have nothing to do with any governmental establishment. In the example of the United States Constitution, the constructors certainly considered said rights fundamentals, but Social Justice is a joke to anyone who thinks one of these rights is equality or that former rights come from man. And Socialism, please. Socialism is in violation of it's right to be an even remotely intelligent system.
2007-01-19 14:09:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Our Constitution gurantees us life, liberty, and the persuit of happenness."persuit not gurantee we;ll get it.
Even in America we are not guranteed property.
Socialism is in violation of everything human.
2007-01-19 14:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Communism restrict's liberty.As far as property,communism
takes what it want's.It has changed for the better but, there is a lot of work to do.
2007-01-19 13:46:56 · answer #4 · answered by thresher 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the undemanding rights and freedoms to which all people are entitled, oftentimes held to incorporate the main suitable to existence and liberty, freedom of theory and expression, and equality earlier the regulation.
2016-12-16 08:46:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋