I'm glad Cliff is gone, but many feel Sam should have been kick out too, because he sat back and watched...
2007-01-19 13:13:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
I think Frank should have been kicked off before for screaming and threatening, Betty should have been for contaminating a medical meal, Sam and Ilan should have been for participating in the Marcel incident. In my opinion they cannot kick them off fast enough because so many of them have violated ethics.
2007-01-20 16:21:19 · answer #1 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why should Sam be dismissed? Or the others for that matter? Cliff was the ONLY one that touched Marcel. ALL the others were there & NOBODY offered ANY assistance.
Sam, btw, was the only one who helped Marcel during the challenge, even though Marcel clearly refused to help Sam when asked.
Even Little Miss Goody Good Ellia is now making negative comments about Marcel.
ALL of the other contestants have been annoyed by him.
He is far from the innocent little victom.
But regardless of how I feel about the arrogant little weasel, NOBODY deserves to be physically handeled like that.
Cliff was doomed to go anyway
2007-01-20 01:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by Vicky 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that Cliff should have gone to the judges table and then be let go on the fact that his dish was not up to snuff.
I think that some of that was staged . Marcel didn't fight back at all . What guy gets physically assaulted in their sleep and doesn't get a couple of good punches in ? Nobody I know , not even the little guys.
C'mon Marcel makes better TV than Cliff does
Prediction : Sam and Elia are in the top 2 and Sam wins it.
2007-01-19 21:47:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but not for the reason they got rid of him. I don't think any of them should have been kicked of for being violent. they never kicked Frank off and he threatened marcel to beat him up. That was violence. These guys were just horsing around. Cliff, however, had the worst food and should have gone. They were right not to kick two people off in a single week.
2007-01-19 22:41:54 · answer #4 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All of them should have been sent home. Even though, the contract doesn't say anything about watching such acts. If I would sit back and witness my friend commit murder, I am just as guilty as they are.
2007-01-20 01:11:17 · answer #5 · answered by tjr 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes they didnt eat his dish it was nasty and to raw
2007-01-19 21:20:58 · answer #6 · answered by J D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋