what IFFFFF, this is a liltle bit silly question but please?

Question

take it a liltle bit serious, like could be a possibility.
WHy dont USA take over complete of Irak, they allready there, they allready put down all goverment all authority , there is not authority there, there is nothing left, than families between this war.
I dont really know what it takes for a country takes another ,sorry for my ignorance , but in the past has done such soo why not now?
Then once USA take over complete they have the power to kick them out shias and sunies and the first religion heheheh this is the silly part Christianity , now if this is impossible , then forget the religion, for a while take out the religion and focuss in build more schools hospitals and no more war please!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

The backlash by the Islamic community would be horrendous. You can't just take over a country for no reason. It would be viewed as war of American vs. Islam... it already is in some places. Just because we're America doesn't make us right. We shouldn't have gone in there in the first place, and now that we've taken Saddam out of power, the natural progression of revolution and civil war can ensue. It would have happened eventually anyway.

I say we divide the country in half by it's natural resources and give each side half.

Answer 2

Your question isn't as silly as you think and maybe this is exactly what should be done. Trying to cater to one group or another is showing to be quite fruitless. I know what they are trying to do but as you point out it is quite useless and causes this war to be a never ending one. The problem is that the USA proclaims to be the saviour to these countries and in doing so would like them to rule themselves even if it means that the rule is by someone who the USA helped to put there. In doing this in Iraq they would have serious trouble pleasing the various factors and as you point out the religious leaders. But as much as it would be going against the world social order at this time, your solution might be the only solution that would work. Saddam only could rule when he shot what were traitors and when one was shot he did not stop there but also lined up the traitors friends, relatives and children. This soon got the word out and the violence was kept to a minimum. Would the USA do this, no. Why because the world would be up in arms. They didn't really care that Saddam did it because his practices went on for years but if the USA did it, oh what a shame. The biggest group to cry shame would be the UN, yet they are powerless to control much and do a lot of talk with no action. If they were stronger on the other hand and had hundreds of thousands of troops to deploy on suspected violators of world peace then that would be another story. Maybe someone reading of your idea may figure it to be the only solution, just hope they don't ask you to be in charge. Don't ever be afraid to ask a question whether you think it stupid or not, it may just be the same thing that someone else wanted to know but was too afraid to ask. Good luck.

Answer 3

Well, thats the kind of mess you get into when you start that nation building stuff. We defeated them disposed their leader and now he has been hung. I understand the temptation to try to set up a modern government there. The hope was if Iraq could be stablized it could spread and stablized the entire middle east.

The problem is no one really knows how to do that. And we can barely run our own country we don't need to be trying to do that over there.

We still have over 100,000 troops in Europe, still there for our nation building of Germany. We have between Korea and Japan around 70,000 troops in the east, again a nation building program. I just don't know if we can afford to keep 50,000 to 100,000 troops in Iraq for 60 years like we have in Germany and Japan.

Our military is quite good at killing people and breaking things which is what armies are supposed to do. I think the best we can do is kill off the remaining insurgents and come home. If the Iraqi government doesn't want to go along with that then we leave. I would leave them with a warning. If we have to come back there will be no nation building, and not one stone will remain upon another.

Answer 4

we would then look like bad guys and to date we are there for protection of the good people of that a land when they too do not want us there in all we there for the fuel and in short the media and the soilders will never be in liberty to let us know why we exactly there for we can guess and assume but its true if we wanted to we could just take over there country but war will never end we are so hated its crazy on top of that bush is good friends with the bin ladins who run the oil in that country.

Answer 5

First reason US did not attack Iraq for making them christian, US Gov. dont give a sh*t about Christianity or the sate of education or health and safety of those poor people. They did it for the oil, and now you can see the oil price has gone down considerably. Now people can buy more SUVs. thank you very much.

And second reason they already took over Iraq, US is the ruler there. They just dont say it cause it will make US reputation worse then it already is. They know they possible can not do any good there or anywhere for that mater.

And if you are thinking about war, US gov will alway find out ways to start war as long as there is oil in the world. So i think we should say "NO MORE OILS PLEASE".

Answer 6

We cannot take over a country that is not part of the USA. It is the iraqi people who need to stand up and get a spine or the USA needs to forget trying to help them.

Answer 7

If the US were to try to take over the entire country instead of just dealing with a few thousand insurgents/terrorists they'd have to fight a country of 35,000,000 people and with only 150,000 US troops that would be MUCH harder than what is going on right now.

Answer 8

First of all...please learn to speak English. Correctly ask, "Why doesn't the USA take over completely in Iraq?"

This was tried by Great Britain in 1918, just after WWI. It did not work then and it will not work now. The US is afraid of China and Russia, the other world powers out there. They both have the "BOMB" and they know how to use it.

Answer 9

What world do you live in where it is okay to just go into someones country and say its mine now, you get the hell out and I am taking over. Unless you want mooore terrorists then your plan is a great idea.

Answer 10

first off,, you sound a little drunk .. might want to put down the rum n' coke... and turn off CNN. secondly ... we cant just blow up iraq with a "Q" and built schools and hospitals all the while implementing christianity thru an islamic nation. or.... we could give it to the jews... as sort of a.. RIGHT for their suffering. kinda like we do in america with a little thing called afermative action.
your question sucks,,, I'm sorry i wasted my time, but no turning back now..