Do you think America should have invaded IRAN, or NORTH KOREA instead of IRAQ?

Question

The president of Iran is crazy and he wants Israel wiped off the planet and North Korea has already TESTED weapons. Why Iraq? I think it would make more sense if President Bush had invaded one of those countries?

Answer 1

None of the above.
There are other, more educated and diplomatic ways of dealing with these types of problems.
America should not be inciting war with anyone. They should focus on fighting terrorism, and stamping out hatred between nations; instead they are fuelling the hatred.

Answer 2

No that would be even worse than Iraq because both Iran and Korea have strong ground forces. The American troops would face fierce resistance from the Iranians and if they did manage to take control of the country there would be an insurgancy the likes of which has never been seen. The North Koreans would also put up a strong resistance agianst the Americans and may draw China in on the side of the North Koreans. Pretty much the entire Asian contenent would destablize even further than it has.

Answer 3

One might want to wish to imagine that the answer is neither. the U. S. lower back earlier the Iraq disaster became busy willy waving at Korea who on the time had a clean and modern-day probability of WMDs interior the variety of nukes that they used to threaten China US and absolutely everyone else- Iraq who had no WMDs grew to develop into the objective for invasion (they have oil!) even as Korea were given despatched the diplomats who defused the area- hmmm ask your self if that could want to artwork elsewhere? besides Korea now has nukes, Iran needs them and blimey the united kingdom and US can't run a proverbial pi** up in a brewery struggling with 2 ****** up conflicts that go away their defense force stretched to breaking and the lifeless piling as a lot as function to the political embarrassment of miscalculation and different mess ups. So upload to that peace protecting responsibilities and otehr protection stress responsibilities i might want to say in the experience that they wanted to lose on each the front that they are struggling with - %. yet another wrestle - choose an enemy - absolutely everyone and the elements might want to be so stretched that they could be dealing with the biggst disaster the international had seen for a lengthy time period. So with slightly of success call the diplomats and climb down from the mountain.

Answer 4

According to CBS News tonight, the Bush administration and North Korea have worked out a deal. The US should not have invaded anyone. No one was attempting to attack us except Saudi Nationalists.

Answer 5

1) N. Korea has a 1,000,000 man army.
2) Iran is twice the size of Iraq and has twice as many people.
3) Iraq had a weak conventional army & was relatively small & the US had won there before very easily.

Answer 6

It took 10 years of Sanctions Violations for the slow moving systems of this World to ever get around to even Partial support of taking down a tyrant who was mas murdering his own people!
Sometimes the wheels of Justice are just flat out buried in the PC Mud!
Especially with the United Nothings involved!

Answer 7

bush used the excuse of weapons of mass destruction to invade iraq, when really we invaded iraq for his own personal agenda. no weapons of mass destruction. north korea says hey we have weapons of mass destruction & they prove it. Bush then sits there cowardly. We should have invaded North Korea. I think Chinas not wanting refugees also played a part. Iran is more complicated. i"m undecided

Answer 8

None of the above.

The military should be focused on fighting terrorism right now.

All three of those nations should be handled politically.

Answer 9

We should take over all of them, install a military governor, and turn them all into giant sweat shops

Answer 10

Im sure they are on the list, just let us clean up one mess at a time..then we'll give them theirs..