English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and you and your new husband had grown children from previous marriages, a boy and a girl, and THEY fell in love and had a relationship, would that be morally wrong, or would it not matter? Would anyone consider this to be incest?

2007-01-19 10:15:27 · 10 answers · asked by orphanannie 3 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

10 answers

Not at all~They did not grow up together or are related.

2007-01-19 10:50:38 · answer #1 · answered by Yo Si Y 2 · 0 0

they are not blood related so technically it is not incest. However, when two people marry and they both have children from pervious relationships, both parents look as these children as siblings...is it morally wrong? YES

2007-01-19 18:20:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Since they're not related by blood, it would not be incest. It may, however, cause some awkward situations and a lot of long explanations.

2007-01-19 18:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by wnk 5 · 1 0

It's not incest, but it is weird. The thing is if they got married and had children, how do you explain to the children? How do you attend family functions, with mom and dad coupled up, and mom and dads kids, coupled up..that's just awkward..avoid it!

2007-01-19 18:26:06 · answer #4 · answered by RAW AND GRIM \,,/ 4 · 0 0

it's not incest but it's not normal either. I certainly wouldn't consider marrying my step brother (I don't really have a step father because my parents are still happily married after 27 years) because that is sick marrying your step siblings. Your family tree would just look like a split telephone pole.

2007-01-19 18:21:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't see anything wrong with it . No it is not incest , you have to be blood related for it to be incest.

2007-01-19 22:08:03 · answer #6 · answered by lovely 3 · 0 0

Not wrong morally or cant be incest. no blood line to cross.

2007-01-19 18:22:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, I wouldn't think it would be wrong. There is no blood relation.

2007-01-19 18:49:04 · answer #8 · answered by Cindy F1 3 · 0 0

No it wouldn't be wrong. They aren't blood related.

2007-01-19 18:27:55 · answer #9 · answered by luvguns2002 3 · 0 0

no, because they are not related

2007-01-19 18:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by gabby 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers