You can tuna fish but you can't tuna Yahoo!
2007-01-19 09:54:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
1⤋
Probably because it's more positive to pick best answers, than worst answers. However, there are times when a worst answer would be good to do...
2007-01-19 18:00:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Weston 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like this idea - every question should have the option of: best answer, worst answer, or both (a best and worst)
2007-01-19 17:54:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scorpion 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think that some people would get offended if their answer was voted worst.
2007-01-19 17:58:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Patty 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Great idea! But I know some people would get upset if their answer was chosen as worst...unless they were awarded 10 points for it, then maybe they wouldn't care.
2007-01-19 17:55:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by puter_patty 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Love it, George, Love it.
Worst answer should get 5 points. or at least something so we wouldn't have any sore losers all over the place.
2007-01-19 17:55:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Seven Costanza 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
if we had that option probably 3 points would be deducted from your points otherwise everyone would choose a worst answer
2007-01-19 18:00:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ωнєη уσυ ѕмιℓє уσυ мαкє мє ѕмιℓє 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is the best idea I have ever heard for Yahoo Answers! You Rock!
2007-01-19 17:56:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fluffy Rover 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I vote for that as best question! Although, I can only imagine the responses that that might generate. Good idea, though.
2007-01-19 17:57:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Commander 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
i agree also, we the community dont always have any power to implement any ideas...they all must go through the staff for approval
which can take a few years till they consider it
2007-01-19 17:57:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would have negative effect. May create bad vibes between users.
2007-01-19 17:56:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by Angel Girl 7
·
0⤊
1⤋