Do you believe that Apollo-Man Landing on the Moon, back in 1969 is a hoax?

Question

i mean there are so many 'unexplainable mistakes'... (Watch the movie "What really happened on he Moon" (2CDs)-available free on torrents- to get knowledge about these mistakes)

Answer 1

Since the Russians had so many other "firsts" in space that they were proud of, and since the 1960's was the height of the cold war between the US and Russia, wouldn't it make sense that the FIRST people to say the US moon landing was a hoax would have been the Russians?
But have they ever said ANYTHING against the US moon landing? No, not a word.

So if the people MOST interested in disproving the moon landing have said NOTHING, then either:
1. They know it wasn't a hoax
2. They can't prove it was a hoax.

Either way, its been 35 years. Time to get OVER this, people.

Answer 2

Get this straight and don't be foolish about it any more, okay? The basic technology required for a manned flight to the moon was developed in Germany in the late 1930s through the mid 1940s. This technology needed a lot of refinement to make a safe manned flight a reality.

We worked on that technology through the 1950s and 60s, and made the first manned moon flight in 1969. It all fits together, and if you read all the history and don't let the wackos lie to you, it will be impossible for you to continue to be fooled into believing that the moon missions did not take place.

The American people were much better educated and more intelligent in the 1960s and 70s than they are now, and it would never have occurred to NASA engineers and managers that 35 years later a bunch of ignorant dolts with nothing to do would come up with a stupid conspiracy theory stating that the moon landings were faked.

If that had occurred to them, I suspect the engineers would have gone to the trouble to create a larger and more visible object of proof, to compensate for the decline in the quality of the American mind and its education that occurred during and after the Reagan presidency.

But there is a real physical proof available. The astronauts who landed on the moon left behind reflectors that are used every day by astronomers to measure the irregularities of the moon's orbit. This is done by bouncing laser beams off reflectors at known locations that were left by the astronauts. Ask your science teacher for information about these experiments. You can arrange to see this done with your own eyes.

Let me put the question to you this way: If you think the moon landings were faked, when did they become "fake?" When did the idea become popular that NASA had invented the idea of an imaginary moon mission and created a huge technological empire to fool people? When was all this fakery done? In the 60s? 70s? 80s?

And why? What was the point? And how did they fool all the people that reported the news, operated the machinery, built the moon rockets, and watched them take off and land?

Do you realize that one American in 500 was a part of the Apollo program? Millions of them are still alive. Are they fooling you? Why? If you go out to a football game, look around you. In the stadium there are people who worked on the Apollo program.

Ask around. You are surrounded by people who know for sure that American astronauts stood on the moon more than 35 years ago.

Answer 3

Don't go by that stupid movie, they twist the facts and when the facts don't match their views they make up new facts. (which is called lying BTW)
It took tens of thousands of people 10 years to go to the moon.
If no one in 7 flights has landed on the moon, don't you think some one would have said so by now?
Remember, a secret is no longer a secret if more then two people know it.
This stupid idea and other stupid UFO conspiracies sell books and more books.
It has become a huge industry worldwide and these crooks don't care what the truth is anymore. They just keep rehashing the same old stupid stories over and over, while real science marches onward.

Answer 4

a million) US flag fluttering in Outer area. no person nonetheless believes that! 2) No blast crater on the touchdown spot of the lunar module. Regolith is fairly heavy airborne dirt and dust. 3) The '+' connect up the digicam have been at the back of some gadgets in many photographs suggesting doctoring. Nah, its purely the way that works. 4) Shadows in different instructions yet purely source of sunshine replace into sunlight. The sunlight replace into on no account the only source of sunshine. each and every thing lit up is a source of sunshine,too. 5) Astronaut's front area seen even after their lower back replace into grew to become to the sunlight. See final answer. 6) Grainy video clips while in comparison with 1969 technologies. It replace into on the Moon, keep in mind? 7) Moon's gravity replace right into a million/6th yet astronauts & that automobile replace into shifting at a million/2th velocity. It replace into run by 4 batteries. not a hotrod. 8) Moon touchdown impossible simply by radiation belt. We have been given the Earth to loosen the Radiation Belt some notches for Apollo. do you recognize what a radiation belt is? 38 minutes in the past 9) Upon superposition of countless photographs that have been supposedly taken at different places, it replace into chanced on that an analogous history replace into used. a variety of of the Moon seems alike. 10) The cameras fixed on the gap suits could not have been used to take such precise photographs as flow replace into very very puzzling with the gap suits. So, how might you have set it up, in case you have been in can charge of photographs?

Answer 5

All the "mistakes" are by the authors of that movie. Those people have no clue!

For example, multiple light sources make multiple shadows, they do not make each object have a single shadow that points in a different direction! It is an uneven surface that makes shadows of different objects point in different directions! Anybody can see this for themselves by setting up some things on an even surface and shining two lights at them and comparing that to things on a surface with hills and shining one light on them!

The movie is full of stupid errors like that!

Answer 6

No - the "unexplainable" mysteries are pretty easily explained, especially if you lived in that period of time (I was 14 in 1969). If you need further proof, find somebody with a short-focus telescope, and look at the landing site for yourself - it's there for anyone to see.

Answer 7

it was not a hoax, and the people who believe it was should be lumped in the same category as those who believe the earth is flat and that the oceans end at the edge w/massive waterfalls that go to nowhere or even in the category that believe professional politicians do more good for the populace than they do evil.

the movie you reference is a joke at best. want more pseudo science try "what the bleep"

Answer 8

Watch Apollo 13 also.

I was there in the Pacific to help pick up the capsule for both..

Answer 9

of course the landing wasnt a hoax how would they fake it like that in the 19's

Answer 10

Some of us where not on the moon to verify this scientific experiment.But many people by scientific faith believe that man hopped on the moon.Who can argue faith?