English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 of the 19 nuts who took down the NYTC were saudis. and the US response to 911?....we invaded iraq. not only was this a huge blunder on behalf of our troops and US taxpayers, it was a huge favor to ........yep, the saudis. those muslim nutjobs would be focused on western-friendly arab nations, namely saudi arabia, if the US didn't provide thousands of troops for them to kill.

So not only did we ignore those responsible for 911, we are sending troops and hundreds of billions of dollars to fight their war.

and what do americans do?.....sit and watch.....hence......suckers.

2007-01-19 08:09:10 · 18 answers · asked by bush deathgrip 2 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Tough talk from behind a keyboard.

2007-01-19 08:13:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

You are goofy...and wrong. You have not been paying attention to the news for the past five years. Al Quaeda/Bin Laden specifically recruited Saudi Arabs as a part of his get even scheme. He was exiled from Saudi Arabia and was opposed to the idea of US troops in Saudi Arabia during the first gulf war. The Saudi government was not responsible for 9/11.

2007-01-19 16:16:57 · answer #2 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4 1

huh interesting theory there. but technically, the US invaded Iraq for harboring the terrorist organization responsible for 9/11. You can argue all day as to whether it was right or not and why, but when you think about it that way, it's arguably not "wrong." While there may be other motives/agendas, you cannot rely on speculation. Personally, I think Iraq was/is/will be in a lot of trouble!! No matter what the Americans did!!!

2007-01-19 16:20:44 · answer #3 · answered by should be working 4 · 2 0

The Congress has the responsibility to conduct investigations; however, none have been, yet. The administration fought an inquiry into 911, the 911 families prevailed and a "report" was published, one to date. A comparison to "suckers" for some this would be accurate, but not for each of us. Compare some of us to the tortoise, slow and steady; perseverance is the key. After all, "We will not be silenced", much longer.

2007-01-19 16:22:33 · answer #4 · answered by S. B. 6 · 1 1

I get sick and tired of everyone bashing the US. I'm a Brit that lives in Canada and for the most part i think that the US does a lot more good things in this messed up world than bad.America is not perfect but I'd rather side with them and Australia than any of them weak willed European countries.If I could get a green card I would go live in the US tomorrow.Maybe you should go live somewhere else for a while and see how crap things really are.

2007-01-19 16:35:08 · answer #5 · answered by plopper 3 · 0 0

If ever there was someone with an agenda, skippy, it's you.

NEWS FLASH! We didn't invade Iraq as a response to 9/11. We invaded Afghanistan because of 9/11. We invaded Iraq because Saddam was reported to have had WMDs.

And, just for the edification of you and the other liberals out there who have nothing better to do with their time than to creat mud to sling at the president, it's not just nuclear weapons that are considered WMDs; chemical agents are also considered WMDs. Did you fail to notice that US troops found more than 600 TONS of chemical agents in Iraq after the invasion? Or did you just ignore it because it completely negates your inane and asinine question?

2007-01-19 16:19:59 · answer #6 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 3 1

Hello! Earth to you! I know that right now I am not in Iraq, killing civilians. And when you say "we", I think you mean "the government". Not all of us are corrupt oil-seeking conservatives. (In case you didn't get that, I'm talking about Bush Jr.)
And you say we're ignoring the saudis even though they were in 9/11, so should we invade saudi arabia also?
So don't say that all americans are suckers. "We" are not sending "troops and hundreds of billions of dollars". At least, I'm not.

2007-01-19 16:17:29 · answer #7 · answered by justagirl 3 · 1 2

What part of "Global War on Terror" do you not grasp? Nobody ever said we were going to war with only those responsible for 9/11.

I have a feeling that if you and your ilk were around in 1942, you'd have been whining about how we were attacked by Japan, yet that imbecile FDR poured the bulk of the war machine into Europe to fight Germans.

2007-01-19 16:16:03 · answer #8 · answered by Rick N 3 · 3 2

Israel receive more than 20 billions $ each year from American taxpayers without their consent: 3.7B$ from the Congress Foreign Aid Program, 10B$ Free Loans Guarantee, and 6 to 10 B$ from USA Tax System Loophole as Charity money deducted from American JEWS Taxs to be sent to Israeli Settlements

2007-01-19 16:12:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Well how rude. I have not simply sat and watched. I have supported the troops, and I voted for a change. Perhaps you should do more than sit on the computer and type ridiculous statements. Perhaps you should go do something to change it. Good luck buddy.

2007-01-19 16:14:54 · answer #10 · answered by nonametomention 3 · 4 2

and exactly what would you have us do? we vote, they renege on campaign promises, we write, we call....if I am going to fight in a civil war it will be over the illegal aliens in our country which are a MUCH BIGGER threat than Iraq...... I have to wonder if the war is not a distraction until our corrupt government can get these criminals firmly ensconced in our country....

2007-01-19 16:18:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers