I don't know about any "magic bullet" per se, but there's definitely more to the assassination of JFK than Lee Harvey Oswald, MLK than James Earl Ray, and Bobby Kennedy than Sirhan Sirhan. All these assassins were merely patsies to something much larger. Oswald was murdered by Jack Ruby before he could be tried, Ruby died in prison as did James Earl Ray and Siran Siran's fate will certainly be the same.
There has to be a connection between all three of these high profile assassinations that took place in the turbulent 60's during the Vietnam War, the struggle of Blacks for their civil rights, and the generation of the "flower child." Nobody has ever found out what that connection is and nobody will in this life. Theories and speculation are about as far as any of this will ever get although I personally will always be suspect of the roles that LBJ, J. Edgar Hoover, Fidel Castro, and Organized Crime played in all of this, not to mention those who prosper financially when this country goes to war for whatever the reason or perceived threat to our economy and political way of doing things.
One thing is for sure, the Kennedys' and Dr. King were definitely a threat to the status quo and entrenched power structure of their times and as the song goes, "Only the Good Die Young."
2007-01-19 08:07:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
There were four wounds not seven or eight and that comes from the autopsy and the Warren Commission report, that is, the official government report. A wound in the back or, as some insist, the back of the neck, a second in the throat, a third in the right-rear of the skull, and a fourth wound in the right side of the skull. While evidence was given for a wound in the left temple, possibly of entrance, this has been discounted by most observers.
While there are many theories as to who killed him and how it was done, no one has produced real evidence to refute the Warren Commission Report.
2007-01-19 07:46:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Randy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lee Harvey Oswald could have killed JFK as described in the governments explanation. Although, the single bullet theory stretches the imagination.
However, having watched film of the assasination, I don't believe the shot that killed Kennedy came from the back. I have shot a lot of stuff in my life (granted i've never shot a human skull) but it sure looked to me like he was shot in the head from a more frontal position.
2007-01-19 07:39:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lane 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
too much disinformation ,my friend is as bad as the lies already out there in abundance!!one shot from a hi-powered deer rifle would have been more than enough to totally destroy both the person and an entire nation in the process and his assassins now rule in his place and will for generations to come!!!you have to accept that and move on!!!three maybe 5 shots were possiblly fire from all paries envolved!!lbjohnson drew out the route that's your first clue!!j.edgar hoover,h.l. hunt ,clint murchesian junior ,richard nixon and herman brown (of the brown and root construction company )had a closed door meeting in dallas the day before the assassination in texas!!what do you think that they were dicussing???the only suspect not there was darth vader!!!oil interests were being inpinged upon by the kennedy's who were oil-rich themselves by them wanting to end the "oil-depletion allowance that paid texas oilmen "not" to pump oil and hold it in reserve!!richard nixon was at the time a lawyer in the rockefeller organisation(standard oil)and was he ever ticked off that he had lost the presidential election to an upstart,catholic,war-hero-golden boy silverspoon toting ladies-man with the charisma of apollo!!!!!and j.edgar hoover didn't want to be retired and replaced while he had breath in him and a summer dress in his well-worn closet !!
2007-01-19 07:45:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by eldoradoreefgold 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i just recently figured out the magic bullet thing is not real. Oswald shot Kennedy in the shoulder which went through to the guy in front.
2007-01-19 07:31:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that there must have been another shooter to cause the wounds. Maybe not 8 shots, as bullets can ricochet inside the body, but enough.
2007-01-19 07:30:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Elven 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The JFK conspiracy issues have been or should have been put to rest long ago. Strange things can happen. There is no proof to the contrary after all these years. It is a dead issue.
2007-01-19 07:33:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by DrB 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHERED YOU GET THAT FROM?!?!? there were 3 shots and only 2 of them hit people and the first one missed, then the second one went through JFK and hit the govener. go to the website!!
2007-01-19 07:31:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by emblebeegirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Overview: Though Warren, it was J. Edgar Hoover who controlled the investigation.
"You can't handle the Truth!" (Jack Nicolson)
(Suppose an assassination saved this country from nuclear war?)
2007-01-19 08:45:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Government as far as I'm concern,is full of it...My Responds is this,If the bull doesn't sht,the grass wont grow!!! I don't trust our gov.as far as i can spit!! Guess What i cant spit,either..
2007-01-19 07:39:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by BOBBIE 3
·
0⤊
1⤋