Because the goverment needed the money to pay for the war , would you be mad?
2007-01-19 07:23:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If he said it was going to be used to feed, house and employ every poor person in America I'd pay it twice! If he were to spend the money in a surefire way of educating the children that will eventually be captioned by wrong minded people in countries that will then send them against peaceful interests, then I'd happily let him have the money too. But spending it on more bullets, more crappy armour, sending more Americans to be harmed for a misguided cause? No way. I'm proud to be American, but I'm not proud of how our hard earned dollars, our sweat and our blood are being spent. He could start correcting his spending by paying some better advisors, analysts and some Q-tips...
2007-01-19 07:35:53 · answer #1 · answered by NotsoaNonymous 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I made enough money to pay taxes I would be hopping mad. That would be an impeachable offense, incidentally.
2007-01-19 07:28:04 · answer #2 · answered by Preacher 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. He does not have that authority. Only congress has the authority to levy and collect taxes.
2007-01-19 07:32:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yup
2007-01-19 07:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
especialy when there is no law saying you have to pay personal income tax , i think if everyone knew that theyed be mad .
2007-01-19 07:27:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yep. The war is already fully funded so that wouldn't be true. That's why he won't do that.
2007-01-19 07:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hmmmm... good idea
2007-01-19 07:25:55 · answer #7 · answered by George W. Bush 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HE WOULD THEN BE IMPEACHED.
2007-01-19 07:27:07 · answer #8 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋