Whats worse:tna or the oakland raiders? I think its a tie because both are unorganized,have no talent, get DESTROYED by the competition each week, have absolutely no future, and the biggest thing is that they each have the worst fans imaginable(losers). I didnt know that they have a lot in common. what do you think?
2007-01-19 06:35:35 · 10 answers · asked by BOB 6 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
TNA.
Raiders will be contenders again. TNA will be out of business.
2007-01-19 07:44:54 · answer #1 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Raiders.
2007-01-19 06:51:06 · answer #2 · answered by Dominique(G-9) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is two facets of the spectrum, you have the WWE "i admire each and everything that i can undergo in innovations from my adolescence in 1997" team who thinks the innovations-set era invented wrestling, after which you have the overly smarky style dependable RoH/Japan followers who think of they understand each and everything using fact they have a subscription to professional Wrestling Illustrated. i'm no longer talking approximately all people who like RoH, i'm talking approximately people who'd look you interior the attention without blinking and inform you that some random RoH indy coach replaced into greater advantageous than Wrestlemania, or that Bryan Danielson is the main technically proficient wrestler to ever walk the earth. in case you relatively decrease right down to the middle of the two varieties of followers, you will understand they are an identical breed. the two marks for WWE and RoH make an identical ridiculous, die-annoying claims of superiority, and that i wont depart out the TNA demographic the two, using fact there are TNA followers who think of TNA is the wonderful advertising interior the international, and that their hair-brained Russo scam angles are the wonderful storylines to ever hit wrestling television. i think of maximum wrestling followers have grown further and further conceited with the upward push of the internet wrestling community. we've progressed from human beings thinking the sport replaced into real, to those who relish a stable adventure, to those who examine wrestling to the factor the place no coach is agreeable. The overly analyitical and jaded wrestling followers are the worst. i think of i ought to hate them greater advantageous than the style-dependable sheeple who shop on with despite's put in front of them and shun all different selections.
2016-10-31 13:19:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, you're such a bright ray of sunshine!
Here's my answer: Oakland Raiders.
2007-01-19 06:41:42 · answer #4 · answered by Widowzpeak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The raiders.
2007-01-19 06:42:56 · answer #5 · answered by H.B.K. 2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow LMFAOROTF that was a great comparison but you forgot one of the main things they have in common...They acquired all of the old players/wrestlers from when they were good but now they all look like Ric Flair old and wrinkly lol. Great Comparison
2007-01-19 06:47:38 · answer #6 · answered by The Plague 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's worse, smokey or a john cena fan? I'd say smokey, because most john cena fans actually have brains in their heads.
2007-01-19 07:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree, but I'm gonna have to go with the Raiders...they suck and will probably draft ANOTHER terrible qb
2007-01-19 07:03:49 · answer #8 · answered by ryboyin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna is worse by far. oakland used to be good, this year they arent
2007-01-19 06:48:07 · answer #9 · answered by YWWE>BVW>mwwe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are man you are..........Raider fan here man. lol
2007-01-19 07:03:12 · answer #10 · answered by wizswole 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋