is excessively violent, more sexually explicit, neither, or both?
2007-01-19 05:42:23 · 13 answers · asked by Philip Kiriakis 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Bubba, good parent, good poet! :-)
2007-01-19 05:46:46 · update #1
Cliffie, I like your distinction between nudity and pornographic sexuality. I agree that mere nudity is not bad, if it is nudity that does not objectify the body sexually.
2007-01-19 05:49:25 · update #2
might as well let them c at the age of 12 years nude stuff on tv but not porn like on etv late and stuff i think or so i heard anyway they will anyway do it one day and see the stuff . might as well prepare them so they cant go
ooohhhh whats that ???
2007-01-19 05:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by Xeon001 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The sexually explicit I woul;d moiter more,
But there is worse violence and sex on the news than in movies.
I was watching Nightmare on Elm street when I was three years old. I came out normal. I have morals, and been told I have a very old soul, so obviousely the movies didn't harm anything
2007-01-19 13:46:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a rule, when we buy DVD's my husband and I watch them first before allowing our children to them. There are certian things in movies that I do not allow my children to see, such as blood and gore flicks, movies that I know will scare them and blatant pornographic scenes.
Minor violence, people making "love", and small swear words are ok as long as I watch it with them and answer the questions that I know they will ask. I try to make them understand that some things will be acceptable when they get older and that somethings are just purely fiction.
It works for us.
2007-01-19 14:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by azmom2624 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Violent.
Although, I'm not comfortable watching sexual situations with them. They (teenage girls) want to see Pleasantville, with is a great movie (we got the DVD), but thinking about the story line, it shows the triumph of openess about ones sexuality and the redemption that comes with it over the old black and white 50's world.
2007-01-19 13:45:21 · answer #4 · answered by Geico Caveman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a violent movie you can explain to a child as being fictional, so I have no prob with that.
The sexually expicit ones, I would not allow them to watch at all.
2007-01-19 15:53:42 · answer #5 · answered by Mushirah A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both, my children are 8 and 4.
2007-01-19 13:45:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I try to keep violent away from my children. Although I would likr to keep explicit material from them, they will find it somewhere on their own.
I can keep violence out of their lives.
2007-01-19 13:47:34 · answer #7 · answered by clutchdoc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both - and it all depends on the child's age and level of understanding.
2007-01-19 13:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by J m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sexually explicit
2007-01-19 13:45:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. It's part of the job.
2007-01-19 13:45:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋