The more fox news gets worked up, the more democrats are doing a good job? The more scared the reps are of Osama, the better chances he will have to get re elected?
2007-01-19 05:17:37 · 22 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
all 6 objectives for the first 100 hours completed...in 40 hours.
2007-01-19 05:21:11 · update #1
AHHHHHH! Jesi! They got in my head! Too many questions on him this morning! If you could see my face right now...;)
2007-01-19 05:30:24 · update #2
hey at this point, a congress that accomplishes ANYTHING is good with me...and you know i like to play Devil's advocat ;)
2007-01-19 05:39:59 · update #3
No. But I assume you mean Obama... (sorry)
ADDED: and of anyone to fall for spin you would be the last one I expected... she says 40 hours because she only includes "legislative time", others say over 80 because that is how many hours the House has been in session... but traditionally they have always included the off hours and weekends when timing the progress of a new administration. (it used to be the "first hundred days" which fell in March because they counted every day... by her way of counting the house would never reach their first 100 days in a whole year.)
Or perhaps you're just trolling... in which case, nice one.
2007-01-19 05:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
No not really, I wonder though why are the "non-Bias" news reporters not reporting the whole story about these "bills" that have been passed... You know like the Democrats ethics bill which allows non-profit lobbying organizations to fund travel excursions for members of Congress.I thought Pelosi said there would be a ban on all gifts and travel paid for by lobbyists. Or how Pelosi backs the Union but then says the employees at her vineyard don't need a union because she pays them $1.25 more than the other vineyards... Or that Hillary's Iraq plan sounds a lot like Bush's plan... Or Harry Reid wanting a grandfather clause so his family can keep getting paid by lobbiest... I mean one of his sons and his son-in-law lobby in Washington for companies, trade groups, and municipalities seeking Reid's help in the Senate. A second son has lobbied in Nevada for some of those same interests, and a third has represented a couple of them as a litigator. In the last four years alone, their firms have collected more than $2 million in lobbying fees from special interests that were represented by the kids and helped by the senator in Washington... I thought the ethics bill was across the board .. Why are the mainstream media outlets not questioning any of this....???
2007-01-19 13:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Democrats got 6 through the house in 40 hours. But how many will make it through the Senate and will Bush veto any of them? 6 bills but how good are any of them? I don't mean how well they are written. I mean will they actually do the public any good?
And I know you meant Obama. Isn't he running for President? In that case he has to get elected before he can be re-elected.
*LOL* I'm surprised at you. Usually your questions are much better than this one.
2007-01-19 13:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Weather or not a certain political party is doing a good job is 100% personal opinion. Fox news is only showing how politically biased many other news agencies are, not how good or bad any certain party is doing. Osama is not in office. He's a terrorist hiding in caves near the pakistan afghanistan border.....Obama is a representative from Illinois I believe......although if you wanna cross referance the two it wouldn't hurt.
2007-01-19 13:22:53 · answer #4 · answered by s_h_a_r_k_k_y 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it probably is true. They are afraid of Hillary and they are afraid of Obama. Edwards doesn't scare them a bit, he's more like a talking "Ken" doll at this point that doesn't set off their alarms (no offense intended toward Edwards). Want to see some real frothing at the mouth? A Clinton/Obama ticket will cause the sale of Xanax to triple among Republicans.
2007-01-19 13:29:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's not true.
By the way....
It only took the Dems 336 hours to complete 100 hours worth of work.
That's what we have to look forward to for the next two years.
2007-01-19 13:24:54 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
just out of curosity, why the hell do you say you are a very fiscally conservative and very socially liberal? Is that what you think the ideal libertarian is? just in case you are wondering, very socially liberal results in a loss of freedoms just so that one can be PC about things, and a loss in religion. Liberal doesn't mean what it meant 20 years ago
2007-01-19 16:15:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since your watching, Just send an email to Bill - the Factor ,, I'm sure he can answer this question for you more accurately than anyone on Yahoo Answers ..
GOOD LUCK ..
.
2007-01-19 13:26:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What are you referring to with "fox news gets worked up"?
I don't know anything that is scared of Obama except for a pack of cigarettes.
2007-01-19 13:20:30 · answer #9 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
I really haven't paid too much attention to Obama, but the shrill outcry from the right makes me wonder if he might be the real deal. If Repubs are that scared of him, he must actually be a viable candidate.
2007-01-19 13:22:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋