It makes people tougher to be in a tough envirnment. Take the eskimos, apache, Irish, Scots. I remember in school how the Indians in California had the easiest living by far before being enslaved by the Mexicans. the comments I read were how lazy and stupid they were. Contrast that with the Indians in the US NE who were extremely tought like the Mohawks
2007-01-19 05:35:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by crackleboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
England did NOT always beat France. In fact, the Normans, from France, were the only people to sucessfully invade England. We call it the "Norman Conquest" or simply "The Conquest."
Look up William the Conqueror and 1066.
Oh, and BTW, the same year, before Harold Godewinson (the English King) was beaten by William (the Norman Duke), Harold beat Harald Hadrada, the King of Norway - south beating north.
And what about Rome conquering Gaul and Germania? I'd say that's a decided case of south beating north.
2007-01-19 05:38:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Elise K 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I was about to say "what a load of cobblers - what about Iceland" when I realised that Iceland beat England in the Cod Wars in the 1970s.
Your theory does leak a little water when you consider that the Netherlands were part of Spain under Charles V, and France beat Denmark and Norway in the Napoleonic Wars.
2007-01-19 05:29:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by the_lipsiot 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is such an interesting question.....I have often thought about how climate influences human physiology; and perhaps not just physically, but also neurologically.
We know that body types have adjusted to climates:
shorter-stockier for cold climates (Eskimo), and longer-leaner for hot, dry climates (Aborigine) .
This does not make one physiologically adapted person more "advanced" than the other. It is simply an adaption to the surrounding environment and particular way of life.
2007-01-19 05:35:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kendra H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask the Norwegian Vikings. But that does not mean that they will remain in power. The victor must also learn some of the local customs and knowledge in order to survive in the local climate and in the new political climate that he has now created.
2007-01-19 06:13:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Finland has the highest per capita suicide rate in the world. Don't sound like they are even tough enough to handle their own problems.
England Beat Germany? Germany is a lot colder then England. Having lived in both I attest to that.
Industrialzation made it all possible.
Cute premise you have but hardly viable.
2007-01-19 05:33:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim R 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
no...
(England lost to France in the 100 years war)
(Russia lost to Germany in WWI)
(Russia lost the cold war to the U.S)
(North Korea lost to South Korea)
(the Soviet Union lost to Afghanistan)
countries that are farther from the equator however are usually healthier because the warmth all season around around the equator allows for more disease and health problems, which makes it tough to get capital and that makes it tough to gain money.
there are alot of time when the north beats the south, but it is because usually the north is financially better, because their infrastructure is not as weak needed to deal with as much problem as countries in the south does.
if you look today, if Canada invades the U.S who would win? If Russia invades China who would win? if Indonesia invades Australia who would win?
2007-01-19 06:04:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kev C 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
perfect, the Russians, the inuits, and the Irish are pansies, as are the Vikings and the Germans. thanks for the chuckle, you misfired wad of semen. Samoans are worthless, lazy sacks of lard that mistake their girth for durability. Turks are the most important sissies in europe, and the Arabs will in user-friendly words attack civillians because they preserve in mind that a ideal scuffling with rigidity will smash them. Sub saharan africans are literally not annoying both, in user-friendly words ignorant and spark off chuffed. The southern italians placed on purple denim in public, and Southerners are literally not annoying in any understand, and are quite a shame to a minimum of a few thing else of u.s.. Why do you idiots talk that way? Why are you so overjoyed along with your lack of files and bigoted previous? the in user-friendly words time I actually have ever considered you redneck pansies strive against is at the same time because the probabilities are massively on your opt for. now to no longer educate how closeted you all are. Come on as lots as south boston, you okie ****. we are able to educate your hayseed *** a swingin time. you're an fool and a foul excuse for a troll, as a well being care service of recommendations-blowing I prescribe that you die in a chemical hearth for the betterment of the human race.
2016-11-25 20:37:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good point. It is said that colder countries have made a stronger work ethic.
2007-01-19 05:25:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by redunicorn 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
People in colder climates make better beer. People who drink better beer have more to fight for.
2007-01-19 05:25:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Doug G 5
·
1⤊
0⤋