there is great difference between theory and practice ,like G bush is very concerned with 11sep attack but not caring much about attacks done on peaceful country like india.
2007-01-19 04:51:01 · 4 answers · asked by dhruv t 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Language should not be a barrier to peace - there are such things as interpreters for instance.
You would expect Bush to be concerned about the 9/11 attacks as they happened in his country. I would expect Abdul Kalam to be more concerened about attacks in India than Bush would be.
I know what you are trying to say - but if there is a will on both sides to stop terrorism and engage in a peace process, it will happen, whatever the obstacles. While conflict remains, this will never change.
2007-01-19 06:14:35 · answer #1 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorists of one country are called freedom fighters of the other!
If all the politicians of this world remain doing good to their own people and refrain from greediness like gobbling up the resources of other countries, there won't be any word like terrorists in our dictionaries.
All politicians should be spiritually involved in serving their nation. Then they will be mutually helping the people of other countries as well, which will result in peace all over the world.
Is it possible? Never it is going to be, as long as the quest for power, wealth & lust remain in politicians mind!
2007-01-20 01:53:16 · answer #2 · answered by Shooting stars 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism is like a disease. To wipe out a disease firstly we want to study it, in the case of terrorism also nation need to learn terrorism its reasons,causes and results. Language will not be a problem.
2007-01-20 03:18:41 · answer #3 · answered by arjunpadanilathu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-23 05:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by TUSHAR 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋