2007-01-19 04:38:41 · 8 answers · asked by Falloutgirl 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Peta called for the destruction of Wolves because they eat other animals: http://unquietmind.com/petawolf.html
Peta shows anti-semitisim in attacking kosher slaughter and equating animals and man: http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/The_Shechita_Controversy.asp
Peta diminishes the loss of human life by inflammatory campaigns: http://www.narn.org/pipermail/news_narn.org/2004-April/000187.html
Peta compares eating eggs to abortion:http://www.peta.org/mc/NewsItem.asp?id=1811
Peta condones slaughter and complete eradication of Pit Bulls:http://www.animalsheltering.org/resource_library/magazine_articles/the_scoop/pit_bulls_dilemma_and_debate.html
Peta defends rabid dog over Police officer:http://www.peta.org/actioncenter/ActionAlerts-item.asp?id=2093
There are more just read their current call to action board: http://www.peta.org/mc/inthenews/index.asp?action=all&ID=0&page=9 - with them aniamals are far more valuable than humans. They repeately claim that but are willing to slaughter ugly, vicious or other animals that are not cute and cuddly - what is their real agenda- I don't know.
2007-01-19 05:04:45 · answer #1 · answered by Walking on Sunshine 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If I had to call the failings I despise maximum about PETA - *their disgraceful reaction to the Greyhound bus homicide many years in the past *their sexism and exploitation of females of their propaganda *the hypocrisy of their chief who, depending on animal-examined and -derived insulin for her own survival, seeks to disclaim human beings an same get entry to to animal-examined existence-saving drugs. i imagine that is mandatory that as veg*ns we distance ourselves from PETA, because many non-vegans anticipate that they communicate for us. in reality, for sure, there have been vegetarians and vegans lengthy, lengthy earlier there became ever PETA; PETA became began as those days as 1980. And lots of the international's veg*ns have by no ability heard of PETA
2016-10-15 11:05:08 · answer #2 · answered by jackson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peta refused to send food for the starving livestock in southern Colorado due the 2 blizzards we had because they claimed that since the animals were going to be slaughtered anyway it would be better to let them die a slow death by starvation rather than giving them any food before they were converted into delicious steaks and crispy fried chicken. Nice huh? As far as I'm concerned PETA and the ACLU can go pack sand.
2007-01-19 04:50:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
PETA does things that are extreme- like the MacDonald's bags they did a few years ago. They are also hypocritical- for instance they think that euthanizing unwanted pets is okay, but then they get upset about eating meat. They also fund ELF and ALF, which are terrorist organizations that do unsafe and illegal acts, such as spiking trees, and threatening to blow up things.
2007-01-19 04:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by sandsunsurf 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
PETA believes that it is better to kill a human than an animal.
They believe that, even though we raise animals JUST FOR MEAT, it is not OK to kill them to get that meat.
They compare killing a dumb cow or chicken with killing a human
2007-01-19 04:41:05 · answer #5 · answered by I STILL hate hippies 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They sometimes get overboard with their issues and take things out of context.
2007-01-19 04:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Pro lifers are more violent that will murder people And Peta has never murdered anyone .
2007-01-19 04:43:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
that its ok to hurl abuse and objects at people who don't agree with their point of view
2007-01-19 04:42:47 · answer #8 · answered by Pia 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋