2007-01-19 04:21:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
It was the hot book everyone was talking about a few years back. I read it and didn't see the movie. I really didn't like the book very much. It wasn't that it was depressing, I just didn't think it was... it wasn't bad, exactly, it just didn't absorb me and it was predictable (not in a plot way because you get the plot from the title - but in a how the characters felt and acted way.)
in short I thought it was overrated. I didn't see the movie and haven't read more books by him.
2007-01-19 07:57:22 · answer #1 · answered by lalabee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Somebody, somewhere must have liked it a lot in order to make it into a movie. I saw the movie with actor JAMES WOODS. It was OK. It didn't motivate me to run out and read the book the way some movies do.
2007-01-19 04:25:43 · answer #2 · answered by Big & Useful 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is quite sad =(
Try Jeffery Eugenides book called Middlesex.
It is a memoir about his life. =)
2007-01-19 04:29:31 · answer #3 · answered by Sorcha 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I enjoyed it. I observed the action picture and relatively enjoyed it and then theory the e book could be greater advantageous (isn't it consistently). I even have it upstairs, I could reread! i admire that there is not any primary "satisfied ending".
2016-10-31 13:04:23 · answer #4 · answered by lobos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I found Middlesex much better
2007-01-19 14:45:24 · answer #5 · answered by Sterz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I found it sad and depressing. Middlesex was much better.
2007-01-19 04:28:05 · answer #6 · answered by donkeehotay999 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love that movie.
2007-01-19 04:29:12 · answer #7 · answered by tennisboyusa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋