....are those same "scientists" just engageing in a HOAX or an EXAGERATION in an effort to get more Federal funding and Grants for their research....LEFT slanted, since the left is less likely to balk on funding scienctific research for religious reasons?
After all...scientists need to eat TOO.
2007-01-19 03:09:11 · 9 answers · asked by bradxschuman 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm also going to point out that there's a 7 year cycle called El Nino that brings up "global warming" just as often. Closed minds are on BOTH sides.
2007-01-19 03:26:39 · update #1
I might find it more beleivable if we ever get to a point of having control over our weather...and we ain't there yet!
2007-01-19 03:28:03 · update #2
"re those same "scientists" just engageing in a HOAX or an EXAGERATION in an effort to get more Federal funding and Grants for their research"
Probably, it's a despicable tactic. Although I am all for unbiased research into global climate change. It seems this is the most effective way for them to get funding. They've been threatening this for 10 years now, and nothing has really changed.
2007-01-19 03:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Global warming is neither a hoax nor an exaggeration. It is a danger much worse than terrorism, and I tell you why.
You can fight terrorism (not the way George W. Bush does) and you can fight global warming. But anything you do against global warming will have effects after 50 or 100 years or even later.
Global warming can kill people not only in a few years, but it has already started to do so. It will change earth, but this a bit later than in a few years.
2007-01-19 03:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by corleone 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mind sourcing that for me? If the left is slanted towards science, then does that make the right slanted towards fantasy? Yes scientists need to eat, is that a problem for you?
I have seen discussions on the global warming problems in the arctic and antarctic regions causing problems there for polar bears and such, but killing humans off in a 'few' years, I missed that. Don't worry your head over federal funding for science, this president doesn't believe in it so its been slashed. He even took credit yesterday for a decline in cancer deaths when it was funded under Clinton and under Bush it has decreased every year including this one. No shame, no shame at all.
2007-01-19 03:24:16 · answer #3 · answered by justa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
may I use the word reitrate , the reason is with no doubt the universe is approching dangerous situation as the global warming allows the direct Ultravioloet rays in to earth warmimg up than it is supposed to be
the reason is the gases escape from various industries reach the atmosphere and create a depletion in the fliter of the ultraviolet rays which is called as OZONE layer , the depletion occured due to the gases by industries cause these hole allowing ultraviolet rays, for example whenever you change the gas in the refreigertaor adds up the warming!
no exageration by scientists for their bread and butter
the developed country only , supposed to be the world leader cause the majority of the depletion with war front !!!
2007-01-19 03:19:34 · answer #4 · answered by david j 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you like trudging around melting polar ice caps, which can collapse any moment under your feet, a wonderful new career in the global warming conspiracy could be what you're looking for. Unfortunately, they ask you to study a little first... and you might find that you don't think it's BS anymore by the time you know enough to consider yourself a scientist. These people are constantly begging for funding, they're not living in mansions like Bush and his friends... if there's a money conspiracy here, isn't it more likely to be perpetrated by the ones who have all the money than by the ones who are still relatively poor and trudging around on thin ice for a living?
2007-01-19 03:21:25 · answer #5 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
According to the media, we all died 40 years ago and now we've only got 10 years left.
Global warming? Which one of you can put the SUN out?
2007-01-19 03:47:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I suppose ignoring very apparent evidence because you can make more money is the preferred method for doing business? Strictly thinking logically do you really think all the activities we as the human race do to this planet, don't have an effect? are you really that Naive?
2007-01-19 03:25:06 · answer #7 · answered by Fire_God_69 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
With the use of 'scalar' weapons that Russia, US & other countries have some outlandish things can be orchestrated even climate changes. Look it up.
2007-01-19 03:41:15 · answer #8 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
david j - simply put WRONG!
www.junkscience.com
you poor fools are being herded by the left and they are paying the scientists to do it.
2007-01-19 03:41:54 · answer #9 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋