Who wants WATER powered cars?

Question

We don't need gas at all you know...bush/america is preparing to use coal instead of gas to reduce the dependency on gas however, I know that this is completely unnecessary, we don't need gas or coal, we need water powered cars and factories(factories create 98% of the world's pollution). Yes WATER POWERED, it's already here however it's under patent and only the military/government is using it currently(supposedly a few car manufactures are looking into it, but it's going to take a long time considering we barely moved into hybrid vehicles). We need to demand this technology if we wish to reduce this global warming, I feel that there isn't much time and the next generations are going to have much trouble if things keep going the way they are.


figures are about 4oz of water per 100 miles on a 4 banger car.
the process is converting H20 into HH0 through an electrolysis process, and then burning the gas, the byproduct should end up as H20(plain water)

it burns Hydrogen and Nitrous Oxide.
The latter is produced by an electric discharge in the empty space of the reactor under conditions of low pressure caused by the induction
stroke of the engine. The combustion of Nitrous Oxide and Hydrogen has the following properties:

1. The combustion of Nitrous Oxide and Hydrogen (N2 + 1/2O2) is an endothermic process which absorbes heat and has a heat of formation
of 74 kJ. In practice the engine runs cool and the exhaust is cool. The radiator can freeze up requiring anti-freeze in the coolant.

2. When equal parts of Hydrogen and Nitrous Oxide are ignited the volume of gas decreases by a half plus some water. In practice this
means that the charge in the cylinder implodes rather than explodes and the timing of the engine has to be advanced by 20 to 80 degrees.

3. Nitrous Oxide contains three times as much Oxygen as does air so that when Hydrogen combusts in it there is an unusually strong explosion. Enough to power the car.

sorry the news clip says HHO and the text I have which is of seperate source says nitrous oxide.

http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=138109

there it is see for yourself, I had this long saved but I found it on the net just for you folks.

Answer 1

No different to me as a layman when byproduct is water. Shouldn't be other way round much better?
Water break down into H and O to run better and better horse power. Hydrogen burns faster and burning need oxygen hehe
final substance produce should be none right?
Because i dont wanna to see every place is full of wets :)

Did you all remember the Chemistry Hydrogen popping experiement? a test tube with hydrogen and hydrogen pop out when a burning stick is inserted inside the hydrogen test tube, remember? Its school paperwork experiment.

Answer 2

Sure, I've known about and supported this for ages. It's a very good idea, but there are two problems;

1. Would the method create enough energy to power a car?

2. How much would one of these new cars cost?

The whole thing needs to be considered in terms of economy as well as environmental means. Think of the cost, yeah?

Answer 3

you could make a "water powered" vehicle with today's technologies, the difficulty is that it would take greater potential to split the hydrogen and oxygen atoms then may be produced by using later utilising the hydrogen as gasoline. you could make it artwork even though it relatively is impractical.

Answer 4

So sorry,but that doesn't work.It takes more energy to separate H2O then is released by the burning of the hydrogen.If you don't believe me look into Newton's laws of thermodynamics.

Answer 5

I'm sorry, but are you asking a question or making a political statement???? I suggest you find another venue to spread propaganda.

Answer 6

You know that they are monitoring your transmissions from this location, don't you? Please encode all transmissions from this point forward. Oh, and look out for that black helicopter.

Answer 7

Well, if they didn't cost $140,000 I'd buy one.