English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-19 02:22:31 · 12 answers · asked by Jane Austen 1 in Arts & Humanities History

12 answers

HE LIVED HIS LIFE LIKE A MAHATMA LIVED IN COTTAGE WEAR DHOTI ONLY. HE REMAINED AWAY FROM THE FAMILY LIFE.

2007-01-19 02:28:53 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0 0

The spelling of a persons' call and call (in yet another language) will become a 2 section challenge. i do not talk any of the Indian languages, yet English isn't my community tongue. I actually have observed that many times, sounds (diphthongs) are written in distinct methods even as replacing a popularity or call. i have self assurance that Mahatma is a popularity and reported/spelled in both international places a similar way (assuming that you're literally not writing in Sanskrit). The 'h' is used as an aspirant in some words and used to create a diphthong in others. it would want to easily be attributed to lack of expertise of the astounding spelling on the time that Gandhi got here to public prominence. As a part word: i'm extra worried that his teachings are a million) attributed to him, and a couple of) taught

2016-11-25 20:18:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mahatma means "Great Soul." Mohandas Gandhi was called Mahatma out of honor, respect and gratitude for what he did for India.

2007-01-19 02:56:19 · answer #3 · answered by Navigator 7 · 0 0

Mahatma is Sanskrit for "Great Soul" (महात्मा mahātmā: महा mahā (great) + आत्मं or आत्मन ātman (soul)). This epithet is commonly applied to prominent people like Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (though sources vary on who first gave him this name. Many sources, such as Dutta and Robinson's Rabindranath Tagore: An Anthology, state that Rabindranath Tagore first accorded him this title [1]. Others state that the title "Mahatma" was first accorded to Gandhi on January 21, 1915 by Nautamlal Bhagavanji Mehta at Kamribai School in Jetpur, India [2].)

The term is also used to refer to adepts, liberated souls, or professionals.

The word, used in a technical sense, was popularised in theosophical literature in the late 19th century when Madame Helena P. Blavatsky, one of the founders of the Theosophical Society, claimed that her teachers were adepts or Mahatmas who reside in Tibet.

According to the Theosophical teachings, the Mahatmas are not disembodied beings, but highly evolved people involved in overseeing the spiritual growth of individuals and the development of civilisations.

Mme. Blavatsky was the first person in modern times to claim contact with the Theosophical Adepts, especially the Masters Koot Hoomi and Morya.

In September and October 1880, Mme. Blavatsky visited A. P. Sinnett at Simla in northern India. The serious interest of Sinnett in the Theosophical teachings of Mme. Blavatsky and the work of the Theosophical Society prompted Mme. Blavatsky to establish a contact by correspondence between Sinnett and the two Adepts who were sponsoring the Society, K.H. and M.

From this correspondence Sinnett wrote The Occult World (1881) and Esoteric Buddhism (1883), both of which had an enormous influence in generating public interest in theosophy. The replies and explanations given by the Mahatmas to the questions by Sinnett are embodied in their letters from 1880 to 1885, published in London in 1923 as The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett. The Mahatmas also corresponded with a number of other persons during the early years of the Theosophical Society. Many of these letters have been published in two volumes titled Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, Series 1 and Series 2.

There has been a great deal of controversy concerning the existence of these particular Adepts. Mme. Blavatsky's critics have doubted the existence of her Masters. See, for example, W.E. Coleman's "exposes." More than twenty five individuals testified to having seen and been in contact with these Mahatmas during H. P. Blavatsky's lifetime.[3] In recent years, K. Paul Johnson has promoted an interesting but controversial theory about the Masters.

After H.P.B.'s death in 1891, numerous individuals have claimed to be in contact with her Adept Teachers and have stated that they were new "messengers" of the Masters conveying various esoteric teachings.[4] Later, many New Age groups used to call them Ascended Masters although their character and teachings are very different from those explained by the Theosophical movement.

2007-01-19 03:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by catzpaw 6 · 0 0

MAHATMA means a good soul, Mr. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was so called because of his path of Ahimsa, his simple living and high thinking nature.

2007-01-19 02:43:52 · answer #5 · answered by A Rauf 2 · 0 0

his name was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi n he lived as mohandas ( lord's servant ) by helping ppl o' india win back their country n spent his life wearing a dhoti onli, just bcoz his country was a colony n most o' his coutrymen couldn't afford the clothes he cud mahatma means great soul n he was atruly great person not by birth but by his karmas.
4 further info read his values

2007-01-19 04:38:25 · answer #6 · answered by upasna_dgr8 1 · 0 0

Because its his title when differentiating between other Gandhis of the world.

I think he earned it just as many people throughout history have. Its the other people around that screw up the messages after the fact.

2007-01-19 02:29:04 · answer #7 · answered by Justin 5 · 0 0

The zealous effort of the great indian leader had made us to remember him all these years.We come to know that gandhiji was not a good speaker initially.Even he revealed that he could not address his friends in his thanks giving function at south africa. So, what do you think that made him to stand against the British? is'nt it patriotism?! Dont we owe him this title?

2007-01-19 03:21:49 · answer #8 · answered by mini 1 · 0 0

mahathma is nothing but man of godlyness. whom else anyone can call him so for his fight in peaceful, unarmed for freedom of indians from britishers. he fought for underdogs, lowcast people, for social equality.,who are now a days enjoying the fruits of it. a highly educated , simply lived. a fit god certaily he was.

2007-01-19 03:45:48 · answer #9 · answered by mohan rao kotari k 2 · 0 0

BECAUSE THERE WERE MANY WHO TRIED TO GET INDIA FREE BUT IT NEED A GREAT SOUL INDEED A PURE ONE TO HELP OTHERS AND GANDHIJI WAS THAT SOUL AND THUD HE NOT ONLY LIGHTED HIS SOUL BUT ALSO MILLIONS OF SOULS AT THAT TIME AND TIME TO COME

2007-01-19 02:41:35 · answer #10 · answered by BEE 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers