Who supports criminal Bush? Who will stop him from committing more crimes?

Question

The terrorists are bad no question. They attack buildings, airplanes and busses. Buit the criminals are worse.

They attack countries, occupy them, change their governments, cause civil wars in them, devide them, kill thousands of innocent people in their home land, destroy their infristructure, stop their develpment. All this lead to more wars and hatred in the world.

Who are WE? I am not supporting him!!!

You are right Papi !!! We are just talking here, right?

Answer 1

I support him. I know he was drunk driving 30 years ago, but give him a break!

(since that is the only criminal activity he has done, I assume this is what you are referring to)

Answer 2

Child, you have completely ignored the basic historical facts. It should NOT have been the job of the U.S. to enforce the U.N.s cease fire agreement from the first gulf war (AKA Desert Storm), but then there too, it SHOULD have been the U.N.s job to stop Saddam and force his military back over the Iraq/Kuwait Border.
Working on the premise that your accusation is correct and that our President IS a criminal.. Can you site which articles, codes or ordinates -- by number, he has broken? Can you recite verbatim those articles, codes or ordinances, demonstrating how they apply to this case? Think like a lawyer.
If you can do this, I'll be more than happy to listen (read) with an open mind and possibly even agree with you. But to date, all I've ever read from others who've posed the same basic question/answer has been:
1. He took away my rights!
2. Fact. He attacked another country!
3. Fact. He lied, he lied , he lied... Ect., etc., etc..
Siting these as examples only proves further my point. Nothing of substance, just lots of unclear thinking from the heart -- emotion based logic isn't logic at all. Site the facts and quote your resources. Oh, and for those of us with a degree of higher education, those resources have to be varifiable and most of all CREDIBLE.
Until you can do this, you might concider investing your time more wisely by looking up the definition of the word "Sedition" and see how it applies here.

Answer 3

I would kill him to stop this shiit, but he is just a silver spoon marionette that likes to think he's a cowboy. There are some other guys who's faces we never see that are the real ones behind all things you are describing.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

And the US government are the real terrorists actually. They use terror as a control method. Look at american media, it is all about terrorist attacks, black criminals on the street, bloody murder ans atrocities. This is what we see on the news and it makes us scared, and when scared people are much more sussceptable to control

to answer ur question NO i do not support bush

Answer 4

First of all he is no criminal. he has never been charged with any crime while occupying the White House, let alone been convicted of a crime. I thought the Dems were going to stop the war? What with, a non-binding resolution? Sounds more like political grandstanding from the left!

Answer 5

that's time for the the remainder of the international to make it very sparkling to GW that he's on his own from right here and that we choose not greater of his top wing lunacy. you will possibly think of the deaths of hundreds of hundreds of Iraqis and hundreds of his countries youthful men and girls might placed a provide as much as his insanity and that the yankee human beings might say adequate. this is yet another case the place the prospect of nuclear conflict is getting used to cover yet another schedule using fact whether that they had the flexibility they might could understand that it may be suicide to to apply or maybe threaten it and if it replaced into discovered that they had presented terrorists that ought to have an identical effect. This employer of attacking different countries on the pretext of combatting terrorism is going to hold approximately WW3 except sanity is permitted to be triumphant. My very final factor is that if one us of a has atomic weapons, why shouldn't all the others? we could consistently be preparation removing all of them as quickly as that's obtainable. We have already got nicely-known weapons, and the potential to furnish them, that ought to make WW2 look like a minor skirmish.

Answer 6

Black_gir, did you get up on the wrong side of the rock this morning? President Bush, is our commander in chief. Doubtful you would have the ability to be commander in chief of just one cogent thought. Should try it some time. Can really help in brain cell formation.

Answer 7

What law has Bush broken? Enquiring minds want to know. If you have a single proveable shred of evidence that Bush has broken any law, call the justice department and tell them so the house can implement impeachment proceedings. Otherwise, please stop posting wild accusations that have no basis in fact.

Answer 8

I support our President, who has committed no crimes in office.

And some of us around here need to see a doctor and get a chill pill.

Answer 9

move back to ur homeland of africa where u can live under gentler and more peaceful rulers like Mugabi or Idi Amin and u wont have to put up with Bush and we want have to put up with the likes of u that will kill 2 birds with 1 stone.

Answer 10

You are right but sadly most americans are easy for the government to fool and are to chicken hawkish to do anything.