English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We know they are good at increasing and decreasing troops but one thing is clear all their effforts have lead to failure, do they have another plan? I hope they have pined all their hopes to the ideas of a rodeo clown and his cronies

2007-01-19 02:07:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

correction, have NOT

2007-01-19 02:08:20 · update #1

13 answers

Their plan is to make as much money for themselves and thier buisness partners until the 2008 elections when a democrate is elected and let them fix it.

2007-01-19 02:16:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

1) Blame Clinton
2) Blame Pelosi
3) Blame the Democratic Congress
4) Blame Hillary for voting for the war
5) Blame the Iraq Study Group for not backing the President

We should be so lucky as to have a rodeo clown and his cronies, its really hard work to rodeo. And there is no lifetime pension or health care paid for by the public.

2007-01-19 10:19:51 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 2 0

they intend to confuse the issues and the origin of this war by expanding it to create a huge emergency and get a bigger WW3 going so everyone will go back to being loyal and obedient from fear. they will attack Iran on a pretext and then the rest of the world will jump in and it will be chaos. they can then find cover for their previous misdeeds that will shrink by comparison. they will blame the Iranians or whoever. it is called BLAME AND RUN or "wag the dog". watch and see.
Actually iran was always the original target as we needed Iraq as a base to attack from. so they are really on course with the overall plan and just ignoring protests.( as expected and planned)
we cannot use premptive strike doctrine so will resort to the old "Tonkin bay" tactic used by Johnson to enalrge Vietnam war( it turned out to be a lie and a scam as we were not attacked by them but he pretended we were so he could do what he wanted)
This was also done with the ship "the Maine" when we wanted war with Spain. We used such a tactic to invade Florida and take it from Spain too. USA is old pro at this sort of stuff.
The people we put in power want a big war and they shall have it and it will profit them a lot and thats that. next time you listen to some little goof spouting religion and/or hate to get votes, please try to be smarter.
remember.. Hitler was elected. he did not stage a coup until much later to expand his power. he used a pretext, a pretend attack ob the riechstad they he engineered. but first he got elected. we voted for this war and cheered it on and watched it on TV as they invaded Irag who had never done anything to us. We deserve the price we will now pay and hopefully we will survive as a nation and be smarter. Germany learned its lesson and now it is our turn.
watch for the pretext and then you will see as we all march off to war in revenge and destroy ourselves. just like germany
Seig heil.

2007-01-19 10:23:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Republicans have a plan for success, not failure. The Democrats have offered no other plan offered to counter it and the ultra-libs who are speaking about pulling out are planning for failure..

The head of the House Intelligence Committee, Silvestre Reyes, said in December that we needed 30,000 to 40,000 more troops. Now that Bush suggested it reyes is against sending in more troops. Once again the neo-libs are playing hypocritical politics.

2007-01-19 10:13:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

The Republican plan is to win in Iraq and to prevent further attacks on the USA so I think you're wrong and the failures have been few. Why is it that you have to completely disregard the good things that have been accomplished in order to bolster your woefully wrong statements? And I have to add that calling the President names like rodeo clown reflects more on your lack of intelligence rather than his.

2007-01-19 10:19:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

As far as I can tell the plan is to keep the war going until Bush leaves office so that someone else can do the messy work...

2007-01-19 10:11:14 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 3 0

Bush would not listen to those who know how to conduct war like the generals but he would not heed there advice. GWB is such expert on the military look how he conducted this war. "Mission Accomplished."

2007-01-19 11:40:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Winning. Failure is the Democrat plan.

2007-01-19 10:11:55 · answer #8 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0 2

We are not planning for failure. We are trying to protect this country.

I suppose you would like to see America lose and troops die. Then you can come on Yahoo Answers and say, "I was right, we should not be there"

2007-01-19 10:18:44 · answer #9 · answered by Culture Warrior 4 · 0 2

keep the war going as it is till the end of the Bush term. If they can get blame shifted to the Dems they may end it.

2007-01-19 10:17:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers