English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-19 02:05:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

7 answers

Drugs are bad. Just say "NO" .

2007-01-19 02:08:42 · answer #1 · answered by j.soto416 2 · 2 0

Both have good aspects.
But 9 times out of 10 i always prefer TNA.
I've never seen a bad tna show.
but i have only seen about 8 good wwe shows in the last year.
I've only seen 2 bad matches on tna ever!

But it all depends on what you like.
It's no real need for a beef.
It's like with wcw. wcw and wwf fans never disliked each other and watched both shows. i'm not sure why the tna-wwe fans seem so combative

2007-01-19 12:14:03 · answer #2 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0 0

Apparently, you're trying to say that Hooked on Phonics didn't work for you. Sorry, WWE is entertaining, TNA is as amusing as a chest cold.

2007-01-19 11:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0 0

TNA has had a couple of years already to show that they can compete with WWE. Hasn't happened yet, probably never will.

2007-01-19 11:33:54 · answer #4 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 0 0

tna suxx wwe roxx!

2007-01-19 10:11:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

NO WWE ROCKS TNA DONT

2007-01-19 10:29:02 · answer #6 · answered by John And Randy!! AMAZING=] 3 · 0 0

I like them both. This is a stupid question, don't just try to start trouble.

2007-01-19 10:52:59 · answer #7 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers