I am convinced 98% of cases brought without lawyers are decided against the Non-laywered side on Techicalities Before any Trial on the facts.
A lawyer who wrote for ligtigation for the Amer Bar asso. went through this long diaglouge on how to defend against PRO-Se the Latin for Self-represented with a lawyer. called it a David vs Goliath deal, then said he never lost a pro-se case.
After a few rounds in the Court System, losing on premalilary motions, winning the cases settled out of court. Then emailing the US Justice Dept. being told they do not track Pro-se cases Also calling the administrative offices, being told here again they do not track cases by pro-se wins or loses. I have determind that its not an over estimation to say 98% of all Pro-Se cases LOSE Before or Without TRIAL.
This means Until mproved justice belongs to those who can fork over 3 month rent for a lawyers retainer. This means more than half of all Americans cannot afford an attorney
2007-01-19 01:58:56 · 3 answers · asked by janshouse justice for all 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Now you know why we have the best legal system money can buy!
The best attorneys get paid very well for what they do...
A person who is their own legal counsel is considered a fool by most standards...
Another thing to know about the "golden rule".. those with the gold [read: financial power] rule!
Does this help any?
2007-01-19 03:05:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am confused who are you trying to sue, the lawyer who wrote the article?? and how can he win pro se cases for ppl?? then they are not pro se if he is working for the ppl?? right? Im confused. anyway you are right its BS that ppl cannot afford a laweyr and you lose w/out one its a scam or somethin
2007-01-19 17:40:34 · answer #2 · answered by lady26 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How true it is. Our legal system is for the rich. In America you can buy anything. Even justice.
2007-01-19 02:07:59 · answer #3 · answered by JAMES H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋