There is a strong pedophile movement in Denmark and other parts of Europe, as well as in America (e.g. NAMBLA). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophile_activism
Child porn is banned in America, although the Supreme Court has allowed text that depicts children in sexual situations. This has led to a boom in child sex stories on the Internet and these child sex stories attract many pedophiles and maybe even promote pedophilia to those unfamiliar with it.
Even though child porn pictures are banned, pedophiles can still find pictures of naked little boys and girls simply by looking at nudist sites. Typically families go to nudist beaches and as such many naked children are present in nudist pictures, which allows the pedophile to satisfy his or her desires.
Do you think, therefore, that nudist websites should be banned?
2007-01-19
01:28:16
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Have you looked at many nudist websites? I am a active nudist and there are several nudist websites that I check out on a regular basis and most of them have NO PICTURES. There are a few exceptions--resorts for example want to show off their facilities but they usually don't include people in these pictures or, if they do, they rarely show any "sensitive" areas of the body and p[retty much never show children.
There are a handful of pictures floating around from some nudist magazines that were published in the mid-20th century and some of these pictures show children, but the same dozen or so pictures keep showing up on all the same websites. Hardly anything that will keep anyone, pedo or not, turned on for long.
Most nudists are not exhibitionists. Most are very shy about being photographed nude and are even more shy about letting their kids be photographed nude. Some families will take family pictures on nude vacations, but these are private photos that they would never post on the internet.
In other words, nudist websites are not the source of pedophilia or child porn. Child porn is a serious problem that needs to be addressed, but banning perfectly legit nudist websites is not the way to solve it.
2007-01-19 17:52:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by spikeit 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Nudism has nothing to do with sex. If you see a photo of a naked child on a nudist site and get the urge to masturbate, call your local police and shrink and GET HELP!!
Paedophilia and child porn are the by-products of a sick society that oppresses and represses nudity and healthy sexual desires in people in the first place.
2016-08-03 23:37:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dario W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nudism is supposedly not for or of prurient interest. I don't care either way you put it, a naked body will get some people "going". I think they are unnecessary, but so is anything that abuses and misuses the human body needlessly and foolishly.
2007-01-19 01:41:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by incognitas8 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is always going to be a pervert about anything possible. I mean, can you ban pictures of dogs, just because some people who are not in their right minds might find it sexual? I realize a child and a dog are not the same thing, but the idea is the same.
Having traveled extensively in Europe, I find their lack of sensitivity about nudity charming. I also find their liberalism and lack of ability to enforce laws to be sad. But I can't see how certain lifestyles can be banned unless they promote something illegal. The most important thing is to support the laws that keep children safe from those who would prey upon them. It's not illegal to be naked, but anything that depicts a child in a sexual situation (be it in a picture or in text) and is aimed at sexual gratification of an illegal perversion should be banned.
2007-01-19 01:37:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by irie.girl_2006 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
the sites need removing there irresponsible ... i know not all people are weirdos but what parents in the right mind would let there family be exploited like this... get rid!!!
Jake
2015-08-31 18:43:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joshua Marshall 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I think that any parent who puts their child's naked picture on the internet is sick. We need to get rid of the pedaphiles,not the nudity.People just need to think twice about what they put out on the internet.
2007-01-19 01:34:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. A picture of a nudist (though gross) is not erotic. Its just a person who doesn't wear clothes. There is a difference.
I agree, though that there is a great deal of pedophilia in the US and the numbers are growing. I think they should castrate people convicted of things like that.
2007-01-19 01:33:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
yes it should be because these sites are leading this world to sin and destruction . today many innocent girls are being ravished and many childern as well by these cruel pedophiles . it clearly shows that to what extnt this world is being led towards destruction by thse nude websites.this is the nick of time for us to check these sites other wise very soon we will have to glunce it's despicable results.
2007-01-19 01:35:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by kabir b 2
·
1⤊
13⤋
Absolutely NOT.
America needs it's porn.
Imagine the predator that clinton would have been if it weren't for internet porn.
2007-01-19 01:31:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
14⤋