English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

can any one tell me about planets astro jyotish

2007-01-19 01:09:19 · 5 answers · asked by sexy sam 2 in Entertainment & Music Horoscopes

5 answers

There have been tests.

Possibly the most detailed test of astrology using this type of method, was performed by Shawn Carlson. His paper, “A Double-blind Test of Astrology”, was published in the prestigious peer reviewed scientific journal Nature, in 1985. The interesting thing is that the San Francisco chapter of the National Council for Geocosmic Research recommended the 28 professional astrologers who took part, and (with Carlson), designed the tests. They also predicted, in advance, what they would consider to be a successful test.

Two tests were performed:

Test #1: Astrological charts were prepared for 83 subjects, based on natal data (date, time and place of birth), provided by the subjects. Each subject was given three charts: one chart based on their own natal data, and two charts derived from natal data of other people. Each subject was asked to identify the chart that most correctly described them. In only 28 of the 83 cases, the subject chose their own chart. This is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that the subjects would select their own chart more that 50% of the time.

Test #2: 116 subjects completed California Personality Index surveys and provided natal data (date, time and place of birth). One set of natal data and the results of three personality surveys (one of which was for the same person as the natal data) were given to an astrologer who was to interpret the natal data and determine which of the three CPI results belonged to the same subject as the natal data. In only 40 of the 116 cases, the astrologers chose the correct CPI. As with test #1, this is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that they would select the correct CPI profiles in more that 50 per cent of the trials.

Conclusion by Carlson:

"We are now in a position to argue a surprisingly strong case against natal astrology as practiced by reputable astrologers. Great pains were taken to insure that the experiment was unbiased and to make sure that astrology was given every reasonable chance to succeed. It failed. Despite the fact that we worked with some of the best astrologers in the country, recommended by the advising astrologers for their expertise in astrology and in their ability to use the CPI, despite the fact that every reasonable suggestion made by advising astrologers was worked into the experiment, despite the fact that the astrologers approved the design and predicted 50% as the "minimum" effect they would expect to see, astrology failed to perform at a level better than chance.

"I have not yet received a serious scientific challenge to the paper. The newsletter of the American Federation of Astrologers Network published a response in January (1986). I was very disappointed to see that it largely consists of personal attacks. Its few substantive criticisms are attributable to ignorance of the experiment, of the CPI, and of basic scientific methodology."

So the astrologers failed their own test. Does this mean they gave up astrology as being useless? Of course not: they are totally closed minded to the possibility that astrology doesn’t work.

2007-01-19 16:11:28 · answer #1 · answered by Chaine de lumière 7 · 0 1

The word Astrology consists of two parts;Astro and logie,the former means stars and the latter means a study.Thus Astrology is essentially a study of the stars or how they affect human life.To presume that stars don't affect human life would in my opinion amount to nothing but fool hardiness for how can such big celestial bodies not affect one when much smaller bodies do.The extent to which the stars affect one's life is thus what astrology is all about.And work it does.But to believe that astrology is absolute would be another extreme.The force of the stars is just one of the many forces acting on us humans albeit a major force.Thus whereas the rays and the magnetic pull of the stars throws some effect on human affairs but that alone does not make our luck.Their are other important factors involved like our free will or the effort put in.That is why they say that stars impel,they don't compel.As for changing one's luck,vedic astrology does mention of some remedial measures to counter the effect of malefic stars.

2007-01-19 09:22:18 · answer #2 · answered by rkbaqaya 5 · 0 0

It can be a fun hobby and there are lots of books on the subject. As long as you realize that, on the reality scale, it ranks right up there with the Ouija board and the seance.

2007-01-19 09:20:28 · answer #3 · answered by Ricky J. 6 · 0 0

I dont know what you want to know about.but matter of it work so it is very effective and efficients, there is no solution to change your luck but it less the your bad effects that make the bad impact on your luck ...... there is a very great site and personality that solve yours problems so for that try this site given below link




http://www.soothsayers-india.com

2007-01-23 06:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by vijay v 2 · 0 0

we have certain personality traits determined at birth according to birthdate and place of birth....In other words the stars affect our personalities so we are what we are and its good to know who you are compatable with...

2007-01-19 09:36:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers