good ahead report..it cant deal with it..can yeah..baby killing..what it really is..
2007-01-19 01:05:04 · 20 answers · asked by Kingofreportedabuse 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Abortion IS baby killing.
2007-01-19 01:08:20 · answer #1 · answered by kathy059 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. They are not lying at all, whatsoever. First, IT IS A LIFE FORM. Look at all the pictures of these "seven week old fetus" and try to tell me it's not. It has organs, lungs, eyes, limbs. IT IS A BABY. Second, "pooping little wretches" were once YOU. Someone took care of you when you were a baby, and I bet they didn't call you a pooping little wretch. Third, Mothers kill babies because of "freedom". The babies they kill have no choice at all. WHAT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION? Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness? THESE ARE LIVES!! 1 out of every 67 deaths in the WORLD is an American abortion. 1 out every 4 deaths in America is an American abortion. Half of the deaths in the world are from abortions.
2016-05-24 06:38:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The ignorance of the pro-abortion crowd is astonishing. Abortion isn't and never was legal in the ‘third trimester’ of pregnancy. The theory being that a fetus wasn't 'viable' (outside the mother's womb) until at least six months. It wasn’t about whether a fetus was a human life or not. It’s about a woman’s right to privacy weighed against the life of her fetus.
Never mind the six month rule, abortionist M.D.'s got around that sticky little problem by claiming that the mother's 'health' was in jeopardy if she were to carry to fetus to full term, thus giving the prospective mother a legal excuse to abort her infant right up until full term. The term ‘partial birth abortion’ just means that they have chop up the fully developed (and perfectly ‘viable’) child into little bits (first crushing the skull with a pair of metal thongs) before sucking it out of its mother’s womb.
The problem is now that with new medical procedures science has outpaced the brilliant legal minds of Roe-Wade. Today it is possible to deliver a viable baby who has been in the womb for less than 5 months. The issue never has been about whether the fetus is a “valid” human life (complete with brain waves, ability to respond to music, laugh, etc.). No, that much is already known if you have ever even looked at a fetus up close.
How do we know a fetus is a ‘human life’? In most states if you were to attempt to harm a pregnant woman and her ‘fetus’ dies as a result you could very well be charged with murder. If you kill the woman and her fetus, you would be guilty of a ‘double murder’ thus, qualifying you for the death penalty in many states. Ironic, isn’t it? The one who is responsible for murdering a fetus may lose his own life but, if the woman goes in for an abortion the day before and kills her own fetus she is shrouded with the legal protection of Roe v. Wade.
The argument that babies are ‘unwanted’ is absurd, as any prospective adoptive parents can tell you. The waiting list may take many years before you can adopt an American baby. So long was the wait that many Americans who desperately wanted to adopt a baby started going overseas to adopt Romanian and Russian and even Chinese babies (one of my friends has adopted two Chinese daughters). An interesting thing started happening in those countries where ‘unwanted’ babies seemed so desperately wanted by Americans; the natives of those countries starting adopting there own previously ‘unwanted’ babies. Now, there is even a long waiting list to be able to adopt a baby in China (where female babies are all too often discarded at birth).
“Forced pregnancy”? Get real. Studies confirm that today the vast majority of women (who abort) are using abortion as a form of birth control. Of the 48 million abortions performed since Roe v. Wade, how many do you think are due to rape? Studies show that only 0.3% of women list rape as a reason for an abortion. Ninety-eight percent of abortions performed in America are elective (not for mother’s health, fetal defect, rape, etc.)
2007-01-19 01:48:37 · answer #3 · answered by laohutaile 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The world is overpopulated...22 million in Mexico City alone.
What are we gonna do ...keep spitting out humans until we ruin the entire planet?
Can we bring all the unwanted children to your house?
Face the facts....children are cute...but they grow up and do something very significant....THEY REPRODUCE.
Babys are not a problem...what they turn into is.....kill em , if you want to call it that.
The woman and the man involved in the pregnancy should suffer some penalty for making the mess to begin with....like having to study about how humanity's numbers are destroying the planet.
Humans are very dangerous...ALIENS. They are alien to the planet and should limit their numbers
2007-01-19 01:20:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, calling abortion baby killing or genocide or any term relating provokes things like bombings on health clinics that perform them along with other pre-natal care and health care.
The religious backing for it provokes many acts of violence. Abortion itself was invented as a life saving procedure for things like ectopic pregnancies. Abortion as a form of birth control is wrong, but using to prevent other problems is another story entirely. It's up to the woman, not the government.
Hundreds of unborn babies may be aborted a year, but hundreds of people are killed by people who don't believe in abortion too. Think about it.
2007-01-19 01:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Novel idea, Why don't we stop bickering about all the unborn babies and focus are energy on the ones that are here, starving, impoverished, being deprived of adequate education, don't have access to proper health care, and are being abused. All within our own boarders.
Until we can take care of all the children in unfortunate circumstance that currently here, we shouldn't really be pushing to add more.
2007-01-19 01:14:52 · answer #6 · answered by smedrik 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
first off i am gonna guess you are most likely a man. next do you know anything about the pregnancy. Do you know the differences between a fetus and an embryo. I gonna also guess no. and to answer your question no because it is not a baby till it is born. So i have no problem with abortion. baby killing is another thing all together.
2007-01-19 01:11:23 · answer #7 · answered by mrs. smutty aka sodachix 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hmm... I'm not sure that would be appropriate term to get people to come around and see the truth. It is what it is. An "embyro" has the entire DNA workup as you or I do. People have a real tendency to get defensive, though. Also, being pro-life doesn't necessarily have a thing to do with RELIGION. It usually has more to do with CIVIL RIGHTS.
2007-01-19 01:13:35 · answer #8 · answered by Trouble's Mama 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Abortion is NOT baby killing.
A baby, by definition in the dictionary, is "a young human or animal, being recently born, who cannot yet care for itself and thus requires the parents care."
Therefore, having not yet been born, a fetus is not a baby.
2007-01-19 01:37:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Does it have a heart beat, blood flow, hear its mother sing, have a chance to grow up and be a much respected citizen, leader, maybe world leader that is missing today.
2007-01-19 01:13:02 · answer #10 · answered by wmf936 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋