Why is it that the Republican Senators want to add a line item veto, when they opposed it under Clinton?

Question

Thats what has stalled the new ethics bill, ( line item veto was declared unconsitutional by the supreme court ). Is this hyprocracy in action or just away to maintain the same unethical standards we'e come to expect from our governmental officals in the District of Corruption?

Answer 1

History shows that this is a "back and forth" battle when a new congress is elected. Both partys want the veto but neither party is willing to give it to the ruling party.

Answer 2

the line merchandise veto is a outstanding device for a President.The Congress has refused to grant it to GWB because the Congress should be extra useful than the govt. branch. it truly is an ongoing war between them. the line merchandise veto became given to Clinton by a democratic congress by the way. The funds surpluses had litrtle or no longer some thing to do with the line merchandise veto power. The surpluses got here about because the great results of the Tech advance in which tens of millions of folk and agencies made fortunes on which they paid taxes. Then too Clinton cut back our protection funds and the size of the military extensively which compelled his succesor to spend very a lot to construct our military and defenses back to the position they should be. even as Reagan became President our army has six hundred warships. Now we are right down to 2 hundred+. Our effortless bombers are B52's from 1960's and our the front line fighter is the F15 which became first presented in 1972. it truly is common to have surpluses below those situations. nonetheless, the monetary equipment became already in recession even as Clinton left workplace.

Answer 3

Both parties do this. When there is Democratic congress and Republican President, Republicans want the line item veto. And when Republicans were in control of congress with President Clinton, Democrats wanted it. I favor it, because it could cut the pork. A reason for pork is to buy votes so a bill will pass.

But the unconstitutional decision was about a bill (Line Item Veto Bill of 1996) passed by the Republicans controlled congress with President Clinton. The senator that helped shoot the bill down with the courts was Senator Robert Byrd D-WV. Oh well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_Item_Veto_Act_of_1996

Answer 4

A line item veto would give the President the power to strike out any riders or attachments to a bill.If you want to get rid of pork this would be a good way.It would also give enormous power to punish the party out of power or a member of your own that is giving you trouble.

I think it would be a good and bad thing.There have been a lot of good bills that have been vetoed in the past because of a rider that the president couldn't go along with.It is an old ploy to kill a bill.At the time the president can only veto the whole bill.

Every thing is politics and we the people will regret which ever way it goes. The less that comes out of congress the better our lives are the majority of the time.

Answer 5

Nice bi-partisan structure the Republicans have going on. I don't think they really love America.

Answer 6

Because the pen is in the other hand now.