Without controling population we cannot achieve the economic growth.The government is not willing to implement the population control measures.Each and every citizen of our country must get awareness about family planning which was implemented by the government.
2007-01-19 00:27:00 · 10 answers · asked by RAMESHPRABU.N R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
ONCE MR SANJAY GANDHI HAD TRIED IN 1976 .
2007-01-21 22:45:23 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're talking about the US and why the US government has not implemented population control, the answer is pretty simple. The ACLU. If anyone tried to pass a law regarding population control, the ACLU would slap a lawsuit on that so fast, you would never even hear about it. Although I think that the rights of each citizen should be protected.... and that population control would definitely overstep the bounds of the government, I still think that the ACLU goes a little too far in defending the rights of too many individuals.... even at the risk of seeming absurd.
2007-01-19 00:33:21 · answer #2 · answered by Paulyterp 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must be talking about India.
Most European countries and Japan and other developed countries have problems with too little population growth. The USA has a population problem in that 13% of Mexico lives here illegally.
2007-01-19 00:35:41 · answer #3 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the Department of Health & Human Services, U S Gov. There
is a little known Department called "Office of Population Affairs",
that is to say, population control. Only those whoes image is not
"right" are subject to this "control". If you beleive that there is no
such thing happening in this country, then you should check out
the above Department and see for yourself what they do. What they really do!!!
2007-01-19 12:28:42 · answer #4 · answered by jobo38 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most Americans are aware of family planning. The government can't really do any more about it because we are a free country and the constitution says nothing about how many children a family can have. My personal opinion is that most of the larger families are those who come to the US from other countries.
2007-01-19 00:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by ctryhnny04 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just wake up. Already 90% of house holds have either 2 or 1 child. The problem is the existing 1.2 billion population. Just forget about the birth rate and it is less than 2. After, say 50 years, it will go negative and then after another 50 years it will stabilise. We will be better in our rebirth and untill then bye, bye.
2007-01-19 00:39:10 · answer #6 · answered by indiananytime 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you should maintain freedom of speech, and in no thanks to grant the state the right to ascertain what's or isn't stated. A each so often conflicting ideal is privateness and protection hostile to verbal or different kinds of violence. once the state is granted the right to stay away from speech (writing, songs, etc.) that it claims might want to precipitate harm, we are on an really risky slope. it truly is why the great court docket, in 1969, (as you reported) finally reached the universal of protection of speech that became proposed in the course of the Enlightenment (and that i have self assurance might want to properly be unique to the U. S.): speech is secure till the point the position it truly is portion of drawing close criminal acts. So in case you and that i bypass right into a save to rob it, you've a gun, and that i say "shoot," it truly is no longer secure speech. How some distance ought to it bypass? Very comfortable question, and my own feeling is that one ought to err on the fringe of limiting state power, as a customary rule. yet you elevate an astounding aspect and that i'm positive you're properly conscious that this can properly be an unsolvable question. My visceral being needs to limit this verbiage yet my mind restrains me from appearing swiftly. Any call for the death of someone isn't secure speech, if that became the case, it truly is unprotected.
2016-11-25 20:10:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course the government has taken many steps to control population. it stresses the importance and the advantages of the medium sized family through various programmes.
2007-01-19 00:39:22 · answer #8 · answered by chincha 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More the population ,bigger the vote bank bigger the vote bank ,lesser the intelligent people , lesser the intelligent more&more votes they can have.
2007-01-22 18:56:07 · answer #9 · answered by DARA 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should stop illegal infiltration first. Those millions of non-citizens are a strain on all of our services.
2007-01-19 00:30:35 · answer #10 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋