No other country has so much number of training centres for terrorists in the world. U take any major terrorist attack other than in Iraq or in Srilanka, Pakistan terrorists are involved in one way or other. No doubt, Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan if he is alive. George Bush is showing double standards by helping Pakistan both economically and by providing modern arms to them.
2007-01-18 20:47:10 · 11 answers · asked by SUN 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I lived in the Himilaya Mountains for five months delivering medical supplies and food to last years earthquake victims.
I had two Pakistani Special Air Service Guards wherever I went.
They showed me the Al Qaeda training camps through my binoculars and made sure I was never taken hostage.
The Government of Pakistan has been battling this for years, but the trouble is not with the government but with the population. The population is stupid and is easily bullied by the terrorists into doing whatever the terrorists want. The Government troops can only be in so many places at once and constantly hunts these fanatical murderers down.
2007-01-18 21:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by wolf560 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan, unfortunately, is the center of world terrorism. Most of the terrorism is Sectarian in nature and funded, but not carried out, by foriegn muslims (Sunni/Saudi Arabia, Shi'a/Iran). There are around 12,000 madrasas in Pakistan many established or temporarily funded by either Saudi Arabia, the United States or Pakistan itself.
As the soviet invasion ended in Afghanistan the United States ended most aid programs and the Mujahideen were redirected to the Kashmir conflict. To protest the Sunni-dominated Sharia laws in Pakistan, and with the momentum of the Iranian revolution, the Shi'a of Pakistan formed terrorist organizations and began bombing both government buildings and Sunni mosques. The Saudi influenced extremist elements of the Sunni sect started to retaliate agianst the minority Shi'a (an estimated 75% of Pakistans population) who were alledged directly supported by Iran.
As sectarian violence continued in the muslim world at a level not seen since the initial sectarian conflicts during the time of the Caliphates many countries have begun to fight a proxy war in Pakistan.
Sadly, there is no reason to expect change from Pakistan, President Musharraf is in weak position to fight terrorism (if he even wants to) and the delicate balance of Islam and democracy will be attempted once again this year. If sectarian conflict drags down yet another Pakistani regime we will be faced with a rogue government, most likely under the influence of extremists, armed with nuclear weapons right next door to India, and capable of sharing knowledge of nuclear weapon production with like minded theocracies.
2007-01-20 20:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by calmflow_21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure of the exact numbers but I believe most terrorists, post-Afghanistan occupation, are from Saudi Arabia, UAE and Iran. Pakistan is the one Middle East nation that seems to be taking a proactive stance against terrorism (their military has actually been bombinb suspected terrorist locations in their country).
I'm not sure where you got your information.
2007-01-18 20:58:52 · answer #3 · answered by Jason 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Pakistan isn't a land of terrorism extremely we can say that some terrorists are hiding in the territory of Pakistan. besides not one of the international places in the international are escaped from terrorism. each united states of america has terrorists in it. we can't classify terrorists as Muslim or Hindu or different Non-Muslim terrorists by way of fact terrorists have no faith. No faith in the international helps terrorism then why we classify them in accordance to their faith. Why the people blame Pakistan (greater useful to assert Muslims) constantly for any of the terrorist activities, no count wherein united states of america it occurs. one and all people comprehend that there are some extremists in each faith which make the main their very own faith. and The madrasshas approximately which you're speaking at the instant are unable to be referred to as madrasshas, those are establishments wherein terrorism is practised. The institutes of terrorism could be the two dwindled or the academics could be replaced. we could constantly advance voice against them. besides we could constantly end terrorism by utilising cooperation and this might basically ensue as quickly as we can think of of terrorists not belonging to any united states of america.
2016-12-16 08:08:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ultimately, the Middle East has been in conflict since the days of Christ. Who is right? Who is wrong? Who are we to step in the middle amidst 2000 years of animosity? The Middle East has always been at war. Are we right to intervene? One cannot blame this all on a single party or dumb it down to an idea such as "terrorism." Ultimately, people are dying... Who's to say who is right of wrong? There's spiritual conviction on all sides. Everyone fighting has a purpose and reasons why. This war is scary. I fear for the future and for the world we live in. Humanity is driving itself into the ground.
2007-01-18 21:08:30 · answer #5 · answered by Adrianne 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NWFA state tribals of Pakistan are terrorists by faith. For the time being Pakistani president is a puppet of US regime.
2007-01-18 21:44:53 · answer #6 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ghandi says that the president of pakistan is playing america like the fiddle.
2007-01-18 20:58:23 · answer #7 · answered by kicking_back 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no i dont think so. but only pakistan can eliminate terrorism from this world
2007-01-18 20:59:40 · answer #8 · answered by bilahari a 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmm.What do you think about this terrorism sanctuary list?
Pakistan.
Canada.
Central Asia.
Sudan.
Yemen.
and oh yeah....Saudi Arabia.
2007-01-19 00:35:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, the reall enemy is pukistan.
2007-01-19 13:37:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋