I think we will get briggs or cato june at LB to replace fletcher next year. Both LB can play the cover 2 defense, which we run. Also, Losman will be the be the QB of the future for the Bills. He has great years ahead of him. Now depending on what the Bills do in free agency will affect there first draft pick. They can trade Mcgahee for a possible 1st round pick. Then they can grab a WR and a CB in the first round. If they decide to grab Asante Samuel in free agency(great move) then they could get Dwayne Jarrett a great possesion reciever to offset Lee Evans speed. They can add depth to there OL with picks in the 3rd or 4th round and maybe grab a RB if they decide to trade Mcgahee. The years ahead look promising for the Bills and I can't wait to see what happens. I think a possible run at the top of the division can happen this year.
2007-01-20 07:05:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wont be biased I'm a Ravens and Cowboys fan. I can say that the Bills started the 06 campaign GREAT don't know what happened after that. If you guys can protect JP you guys can at least win a wild card I don't think you'll win the division with Tom Brady still in there, and the Jets. But the Bills have a great QB and young receiver core. I think they'll fare 10-6 next season or 9-7. If you want go to nfl.com and they have next years schedule out.
2007-01-18 20:39:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they are definitely on the right track. JP, even though he still needs to mature some, looks like he might a pretty decent NFL QB. Lee Evans has emerged as a primetime WR. He used to be good for the occasional long TD but now he is a lock for 85-90 catches a year and of coure they should be solid for years to come at RB with McGahee back there. I think their biggest problems are along both offensive and defensive line. They were 28th against the run last year and also were the 6th worst rushing team in the league. There seems to be a couple good OL coming out this year and if they are able to land Briggs that would go a long way towards helping their run D. They of course play in a good division but on top of that they play a monster schedule next year that includes Baltimore, Dallas, Jacksonville, Cincy, NY Giants, Pitt and Phili...even with marked improvement against that schedule I see them going 7-9 at absolute best...that might not sound great but I'm a Raider fan and would take that record next year in a heartbeat.
2007-01-18 21:55:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Big Jefe 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Lynch is barely a rookie the 2d terrific interior the draft however the RB place became susceptible. McGahee became greater helpful and could have a greater helpful carrer than Lynch. The costs nonetheless SUCK at QB. How can a team be exciting and not applying a a million/2 way respectable QB? J.P. Losman is a third string, at terrific. As for cover, The "solid" gamers they have been given rid of have been the terrific on the fees protection and are greater helpful than the no-names they have now. they are going to be fortunate to get 4-5 wins. yet they could have a precise 5 draft %. next year simply by fact they suck that undesirable. Definatly the least exciting team to visual demonstrate unit next year.
2016-12-12 15:02:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We'll see if Losman is the real deal. They need to beef up at most positions. If they can get a good draft, and get some good free agents, they could get second in that division. It's a weak division after the Pats. The Jets aren't impressive. Neither are the Dolphins.
2007-01-18 22:44:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jack O'Lantern 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Man I hate to say it but the last name of your QB fits him, forget drafting a CB it should be a QB
2007-01-18 21:15:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by JOHN D 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
They'll be under 500
2007-01-18 20:37:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
THEY ARE GOOD BUT THEY CANT WIN IN THEIR DIVISON WITH THE PATRIOTS AND THE JETS WHO BOTH MADE THE PLAYOFFS
2007-01-19 06:07:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dont really care its a wimps sport
2007-01-18 23:46:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋