of the Islamic faith should be allowed to have the Koran present (and I suppose, sworn upon) in an American court of law. They appear to be defending those of the Islamic (American but mostly foreign) faith in our courts. They are evidently saying that this is their holy book and should not be denied them. Islamics, you know, the ones involved in the 9/11 terrorism. The ones suicide car bombing men, women and childern in Iraq and Iran. The ones that are shooting American military. This is the same ACLU that says ite Bible should not be allowed in a court of law. Surveys indicate that the majority of Americans hold some sort of Christian or Biblical views. The same ALCU that says there should be no Christian display in public places. The ALCU is standing up for Islamics but openly disaprove Christian holdings, rights and expressions of faith. Islamics -OK.. Christians - No way. Does this make you wonder "who's side are they on?" Disavow your own people but approve others? Reply
2007-01-18 18:46:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The ACLU is anti-American and anti-Christian. They are also anti-Jewish.
The lawsuit was filed in 2005, so that makes it OK to Islamify America? They want Sharia Courts in Canada, next they'll want that here, too. Anyway that Islamacists can take power they will, and here at home in the US, they will get all the help they need from the ACLU. After all we have to be fair to everyone, even if we give up being who we are.
2007-01-18 18:55:51 · answer #1 · answered by Susan M 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I went to an internet site, suggested the delivery certificate style pictured there and which could no longer what you're soliciting for. you want the unique that provides the marital status of the mothers and fathers, what number toddlers this woman has had, the information and the only shown isn't it. Now although in case you suggested the unique, did not his father have his center call replaced, after the delivery and then had the newborn's call also replaced so the middle call might want to be Hussein (sp)? understanding that little bit of ideas, that could want to factor out the delivery certificate released by technique of the marketing campaign became the altered one because the daddy's call is listed as Barack Hussein Obama. something has genuinely been 'adjusted' to healthful the get jointly.
2016-10-15 10:47:06 · answer #2 · answered by serpa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a like/hate set of feelings about the ACLU. For example, I disagree with them about the way that they interpret the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. That's the kind of litigation they engage in wherein they (as you put it) say "there should be no Christian displays in public places."
On the other hand, I DO agree with them in the way that they litigate to protect the Free Exercise Clause. And I DO agree with them if they're trying to protect the right of people of the Muslim faith to use the Koran.
And if you are trying to tell us that we should be afraid of all people of the Muslim faith because all Islamic believers are terrorists, then you are a bigot. That is a terrible oversimplification; it is a generalization, a stereotype. People deserve to be looked upon and treated as individuals. Someday, you may wish that people will treat YOU as an individual, rather than according to some stereotype that they have of all WASPs.
2007-01-18 18:57:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This isn't true. The ACLU filed suit in North Carolina because ONLY the christian bible is allowed for swearing oaths. For anyone, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, whatever, they must swear on a Christian Bible. Shouldn't the state either clarify that to allow any religious text, or ban religious texts altogether? Why should a Jew swear on a New Testament?
2007-01-18 18:58:29 · answer #4 · answered by Charles D 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sigh...do some research. The ACLU has never said the bible should not be allowed in court. The bible is rarely used in any US court; people testifying may choose to use it if they wish, or just take a secular oath.
If someone wants to swear on the koran to affirm that they will be telling the truth, how does this affect you in any way?
Oh, by the way, this suit was filed in 2005.
2007-01-18 18:52:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
And you're shocked by this? The ACLU also represents NAMBLA (the North American Man Boy Love Association). If they're going to fight to protect the rights of child molesters, should this really surprise us?
2007-01-18 19:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Do you mean the Anti Christian Legal Undertaking? The protectors of Illegal aliens, child molesters and criminals? Surely not!
2007-01-18 20:08:12 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the ACLU are a bunch of troublemakers and seem to go against everything that is good or right.
2007-01-18 18:54:49 · answer #8 · answered by Texas T 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The ACLU can kiss my tail. Period. They have no clout with me.
2007-01-18 19:14:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋