2007-01-18 17:27:23 · 9 answers · asked by yudi kicks ass 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Not really. The WWE has good wrestlers it's just they don't let them do high risk moves and the storylines they put the wrestlers in just happen to suck.
2007-01-18 19:21:05 · answer #1 · answered by ben_sheets_15 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think TNA has more talented wrestlers, they just aren't as famous. Also, TNA wrestlers work on tna for maybe 5 days a month where WWE wrestlers work for WWE 4 days a week, all those matches at house shows and live events do take their toll which is why Kurt Angle wanted to leave so bad. I think the mic work is much better on TNA also, WWE keeps crappy actors like Kane, Johnny nitro, Batista, Umaga, Great Khali, and Lashley (lashley mumbles and talks like an idiot, he never used to talk on smackdown) Yet they still have a few guys with great mic work who can really cut a promo, like Cena and CM punk. All in all WWE has potential, but TNA is actually using its potential.
2007-01-18 17:51:48 · answer #2 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont know how anyone could argue anywise.
With about 4 exceptions everyone on tna can wrestle their butts off.
But on Raw there is only about 7 decent wrestlers, smackdown has about 8 and ecw has maybe 3.
Wrestling wise, the best wrestlers on wwe couldnt keep up with the opening matches of tna shows. Watching wwe after watching a tna show is almost like watching the minor leagues.
I cant wait until they get a 2nd hour.
2007-01-18 17:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No TNA does not have better wrestlers than WWE.
Totally Nothing Accomplished
2007-01-19 03:48:59 · answer #4 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hard to determine because some of the TNA guys were old wwe or wcw guys. but I gotta say I do find myself wanting to watch TNA over ECW and Smackdown.. but Raw that's still my fav show and I do hope TNA gets another hour in the future
2007-01-18 17:36:49 · answer #5 · answered by seekerman5000 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no, only a few i think A.j styles and samoe joe are really good wrestlers,, and kurt angle was always good,, and TNA is way too scripted than WWE...and the other guys are a bunch of leftovers from the wwe..
2007-01-18 17:38:22 · answer #6 · answered by suren D 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
May be
2007-01-18 17:39:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES TNA ARE 90% BETTER BUT THE TELECASTING IS BETTER THAN T.N.A
2007-01-18 17:37:47 · answer #8 · answered by Sekar 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
definetly except they dont have undertaker or mysterio or batista or benoit or regal or finlay.
2007-01-19 05:01:41 · answer #9 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋