English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A geometric isomers


B enantiomers


C covalent isomers


D structural isomers

2007-01-18 16:51:06 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

5 answers

Three options are correct!

A geometric isomers
B enantiomers
D structural isomers


There is nothing as covalent isomers!!

Based on your question which emphasizes on "diff. arrrangement of atoms" all three options are correct!

2007-01-18 18:43:07 · answer #1 · answered by Som™ 6 · 0 0

sure, all isomers have comparable molecular formulation. In chemistry, isomers are molecules with the comparable chemical formulation and countless times with the comparable varieties of chemical bonds between atoms, yet wherein the atoms are arranged in yet in any different case (analogous to a chemical anagram). it truly is to assert, they have different structural formulae. Many isomers proportion comparable if no longer same residences in maximum chemical contexts. this could not be at a loss for words with a nuclear isomer, which includes a nucleus at different states of excitement.

2016-12-14 05:16:54 · answer #2 · answered by clumm 3 · 0 0

The answer is not B, it is D. Enantiomers are mirror image molecules that are not superimposible on each other (eg: your right and left hands) but have the SAME arrangement of atoms. Structural isomers are the ones that have diff. arrangement of atoms but the same formula. So the answer is definitely D.

2007-01-18 17:31:27 · answer #3 · answered by Jeff 2 · 0 1

Structural isomers are molecules with same molecular formula different structural formulae.

Just go to this link. http://www.ausetute.com.au/namisene.html

2007-01-18 17:36:33 · answer #4 · answered by Jackie G 1 · 0 1

B. Enantiiomers

Eliminate c, because basically, there is no such accepted term.
Eliminate a, because examples of cis and trans usually refers to arrangement vis-a-vis a plane, opposite or same side.
Eliminate d, because it is a term that is more of the structure and has nothing to do with 3-dimentional arragement.

2007-01-18 17:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by Aldo 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers