Wow...what next? Will the U.S. have more problems than it can handle?

Question

U.S. Criticizes China Over Missile Test
By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer
2 hours ago

WASHINGTON - The United States criticized China on Thursday for conducting an anti-satellite weapons test in which an old Chinese weather satellite was destroyed by a missile.

The Bush administration has kept a lid on the test for more than a week as it weighs its significance. Analysts said China's weather satellites would travel at about the same altitude as U.S. spy satellites, so the test represented an indirect threat to U.S. defense systems.

"The United States believes China's development and testing of such weapons is inconsistent with the spirit of cooperation that both countries aspire to in the civil space area," National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. "We and other countries have expressed our concern to the Chinese."

In his annual threat address to Congress, the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, said last week that China and Russia are the "primary states of concern" regarding military space programs.

"Several countries continue to develop capabilities that have the potential to threaten U.S. space assets, and some have already deployed systems with inherent anti-satellite capabilities, such as satellite-tracking laser range-finding devices and nuclear-armed ballistic missiles," he said in his written testimony on Jan. 11, the same day China's test was conducted.

The test, first reported by Aviation Week, destroyed the satellite by hitting it with a kinetic kill vehicle launched aboard a ballistic missile.

In October, President Bush signed an order asserting the United States' right to deny adversaries access to space for hostile purposes. As part of the first revision of U.S. space policy in nearly 10 years, the policy also said the United States would oppose the development of treaties or other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit U.S. access to or use of space.

"Freedom of action in space is as important to the United States as air power and sea power," the policy said. "In order to increase knowledge, discovery, economic prosperity and to enhance the national security, the United States must have robust, effective and efficient space capabilities."

Precisely what drove China to act now remains a mystery. But the United States has to figure out how to respond, said John Pike, a satellite expert at globalsecurity.org.

Since the mid-1980s, the United States has had the ability to take down satellites, but the Chinese don't have satellites worth attacking, Pike said. The United States may have to develop alternatives to its current spy satellites _ perhaps stealthy satellites or unmanned aerial vehicles, which are harder to detect than the current well-established U.S. satellite network.

Reconnaissance satellites in low-Earth orbit _ "eyes in the sky" _ are essential to how the United States fights wars.

"Our space assets are the first asset on the scene," Pike said. "They are absolutely central to why we are a superpower _ a signature component to America's style of warfare."

The Defense Department declined to comment on the test.

Adm. William Fallon, the chief of U.S. Pacific Command, has spearheaded a major push to revive exchanges with the Chinese military. Ties soured after a U.S. spy plane collided with a Chinese fighter plane in 2001.

Fallon has pushed ahead with the program, despite criticism inside the Pentagon. He believes that Chinese and U.S. officers need to understand each another better to avoid disastrous miscalculations.

Bush nominated Fallon this month to take over command of troops in the Middle East.

___

AP White House Correspondent Terence Hunt contributed to this report.

Answer 1

It's been a lot worse Laura, a lot worse. You did not have the "pleasure" of growing up in the Cold War Era. The possibility of a world wide nuclear holcaust was very real then. So far as satellite killers go, the USSR has had them for years. Even though there is no USSR as we knew it then , those technologies still exist.
I believe that the best thing for America to do is to just have the bigger club than anyone else has.
So far as the Middle East is concerned, developing alternative fuels would be a major sword in their sides. If we have no need of their oil, then their hold over us, or anyone else will be less effective. No, while this may look bad, it has been worse, a lot worse.

Answer 2

I also pray. But i get piece of paper and write down the problem and draw a vertical line underneath it. I then sit and think of up to 10 pros and cons for the answers, complete with what may happen if I chose to do whatever. Usually by the time I've gotten to number 5, at the most, the problem doesn't seem worth bothering about, or I have forgotten why it wassuch an issue in the first place. If you are a Christian then simply say a prayer like this "Lord Jesus, this problem is far too difficult for me know how to cope with, please help me, as I know that there is nothing too great or too small for you to cope with". I know He will then help you everystep of the way. Luise J

Answer 3

As long as the US is in IRaq, Us will continue to face international conflicts. Either it be with IRAn, Iraq, Russia, Pakistan, Afganistan, NOrth Korea, and now china decides to tempt the US. We are not that popular anymore as we used to. ..And since the military is over stretched thin, in the middle east were more vulneralbe to threats... just my opinion.

Answer 4

In my opinion, most of the world and all of it's leaders have gone mad. There is tension everywhere, and I certainly don't feel very safe or confident that my Government will make the right decisions. It certainly is a worrisome time to be an inhabitant of our planet.

Answer 5

What the news said is quite onerous isn't it?. It says that the U.S. is the only nation who had the right to use space.
The U.S. didn't own space, yet it wanted to have the sole right to use it.

Answer 6

Huh, we are not going to war with China if that is what u r asking.