If you may,Bush made not great decision but inept and absurd ones. Furthermore, neither one has foreign policy experience to compare them, now Condi Rize might has more experience then both of them together.However, her experience has been a zero in the white house.
2007-01-18 12:52:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well actually Bush was the Governor of a border state and had a good deal of relations with Mexico. I don't know what Obama has done except move words around a room.
2007-01-18 12:59:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
seize 22, choosing an incredibly good overseas coverage vice president will make it look like the vice president is doing the hard determination if a disaster/conflict breakout(cheney/bush). i've got faith he could desire to elect somebody to assist win the election. there are maximum of advisors on each and every persons group that one man or woman won't make a difference. the vice president is a discern head purely like the president. whilst this u . s . a . receives a powerful third occasion it is going to help the rustic. If he would not %. Hillary then Mccain can elect a woman and get maximum woman votes for those that defected from the democratic factor for Barack Hussein Obama no longer identifying on Hillary
2016-12-14 05:06:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama has never governed, besides foriegn policy is just one of many management skills needed to be presidential. Foreign policy is like cough medicine, too much and you're no longer able to function. We learned that from the Clinton administration. That man would avoid confrontation to the point that he ran out of cheeks to turn. The result of slick willie's foreign policy was the US was attacked on six different occasions and never defended or responded to in kind, not even once!
This country can nearly afford to return to those cowardly days of the Clinton administration. We cannot afford to be wrong, not even once, the consequences could be devastating. To put in another silver tongue who believes he can reason with anyone, could be a fatal mistake. Personnaly, I would prefer to attack our enemy when it appears necessary and ask questions later. Too often we have waited in the face of potential danger, only to suffer the devastation of 9/11. That's not my idea of good management!
2007-01-18 13:04:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
FYI-There are photos out there showing little Bushie next to "Uncle" Rummie alongside his Dad, the Head of the CIA back in the early 70's. Now consider the FACT that the Bush Family is involved in BUSHCO, an international Oil Firm and that his Brother's have family ties to Mexico's Elite, and Daddy was first a Vice President and then the President!
Let's overlook his succesfull stint as the Governor of the little State of Texas!
Yeah, GWB just fell off a Turnip Truck alright!
LMFAO!!!!!
2007-01-18 12:53:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Let's face facts, most newly elected Presidents don't have any or very little foreign policy experience. Mostly governors are elected to the Presidency. In my opinion this is a non-issue, that's why Presidents have cabinet members.
2007-01-18 13:00:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They might be about the same, but Obama knows what he does not know and will seek to learn it. Bush thought he already knew all the answers and didn't "need" anyone elses advise.
Bill Clinton had limited foreign policy experience, but he is very smart and had a hunger to learn so his foreign policy was very successful.
2007-01-18 12:51:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
As a governor, Bush already had some experience with foreign policy, especially since Texas is a frontier state. The lack of intellect displayed by some is astounding.
2007-01-18 12:52:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
President Bush had experience as a Governor. Barrack has little experience as a legislator. That will not even get him to the primaries. Liberals need to stop backing losers.
2007-01-18 12:50:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
What happen the last time DNC ran a liberal.
They lost now you put up Obama who we know he as liberal or more than Kerry.
How can he win.
2007-01-18 12:51:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋