Yes I remember Whitewater; I also remember that Hillary was the lawyer who wrote the legal papers that kept it covered up for some time. I also remember that Hillary's legal files disappeared for two years and then reappeared outside her bedroom door. Then the FBI said that she could not have revised them because there were only two fingerprints on two pieces of paper. I guess rubber gloves must have been worn by the law clerks and Hillary otherwise all pieces of paper would have prints when removed from a printer. There is a fact for people to think about when they consider voting for her.
2007-01-18 13:06:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charles W 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
You are forgetting the end result of the "Whitewater Scandal" and that is - nothing. No charges, no arrests, no convictions and no findings of any thing illegal. The Whitewater Scandal was manufactured by Ken Starr ( now, unfortunately, the UC Pepperdine School of Law Dean ) and then jumped into the Monica thing. When Ken Starr wrote his final investigative report ( that cost YOU more than 60 million dollars ) the word "Whitewater" was mentioned only three times. The word 'sex' was written over 50 times - so what is your point exactly? That you don't know any history and dredging up lies so people don't like Ms. Clinton? Or, that you are don't know any history and trying to make people dislike Ms. Clinton? Okay, I can do that to. Did you know that George W. Bush, your favorite president, orchestrated 9/11, and that he wants to start WWIII? That, he really wants to be a dictator because he doesn't listen to people in his own party, the Democratic party, or 75% of the American people? Ok, so now, what is wrong with Hillary, and what should the voters remember in 2008 about who so royally screwed up the country?
2007-01-18 12:19:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by commonsense 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's history, Nothing was found. Let's move on with the present and hopefully improve the future. Do you think Ken Starr will spend as much time & money on the Bush investigation?
2007-01-18 14:39:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I in basic terms want to make clean. Muslims/Islam are/is quantity 2 by technique of non secular inhabitants at 24%. Islam is likewise about peace, regardless of the way it presently seems (hi, the crusades were no longer very Christian both). regrettably, I have suggested many political figures declaring that our conflict is adverse to radical Islam; that is pretend. The conflict is "The conflict on Terror," and is for this reason on terror, no longer on a non secular idea. by technique of get jointly, if a set of common Christians attacked Canada because they felt Canadians worshiped the devil, that does no longer advise all Christians felt that way, common or no longer. in basic terms because a small component of an problem-free team does something, does no longer advise all of them help and condone those moves. also, because it would want to be with Christians, putting ahead conflict adverse to radical Islam might want to in all probability piss off all of Islam, contributing to a hate of the U. S., and lengthening anti-US struggling with.
2016-10-15 10:28:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either people hate her or love her. Of course the scandal subjects and all the subjects about her will rise up again.
2007-01-18 12:12:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Even Ken Starr (and he is no liberal) said there was nothing to the Whitewater thing.
Let it go...
2007-01-18 12:27:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No of course not. She is a Democrat, she gets a pass from the Liberal Media.
2007-01-18 12:13:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Greg M 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
yep......and all the other right wing driven investigations that cost taxpayers over $150 million.
2007-01-18 13:42:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
white water
travel gate
cattle futures
vince foster
etc
etc
etc
2007-01-18 12:26:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by my name is call me ishamael 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Whitewater? WTF? Iraq is the biggest FUBAR and you wanna focus on WhiteWater?
You gotta be listening to the moronic CONSERVATIVE media.
2007-01-18 12:18:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by kenny J 6
·
2⤊
2⤋