No, I would swap out "specifically" for "especially", but it is still a clumsy sentence
2007-01-18 11:57:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, it is grammatically correct. However, it would sound better to replace "pieces of literature" with "works of literature" and the use of tragedies and tragic is redundant.
2007-01-18 20:04:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by whatever 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with calvaman, it's like saying, "in comedies, a comic character is used." You need to write a sentence that is actually making a point and says more than stating the obvious. If you could expound upon how the tragic hero is used you would have something...
2007-01-18 20:27:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kimberly V 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
May I suggest....... Literature that we classify as tragedies, is named such because of the tragic hero.
Or if you do not have to be constrained by a single sentance. ......There are many genre's of literature. The tragedy is as old as ancient Greece. The tragedy is named as such because the hero of the story will face a very sad ending.
2007-01-18 20:05:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by dharp66 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grammatically it is correct. However, you don't want to say, "a tragic hero is used." Rather, "the character of a tragic hero is employed."
2007-01-18 19:57:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by XOXOXOXO 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
technically yes. i would put "specifically tragedies" at the end of the sentence
2007-01-18 20:01:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by cheerstar114 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
uh huh
2007-01-18 20:03:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Calvin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure, but it sounds off somewhere to me.
2007-01-18 20:05:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
instead of is I would use was.
2007-01-18 20:01:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by karen v 6
·
0⤊
0⤋