hes a fool and a great candidate for the democrats. hillarys opponents have disapeared before. kiss hiss *** good bye
and thats a memo
2007-01-18 11:51:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush's drug use did not bother any Republicans. Also Hillary has $70 million in the bank now, she will need $500 million. Obama will never raise that much. Even with Operas backing. Bill Gates is still backing Hillary/Edwards. That will give Democrats 8 years in the White House.
2007-01-18 11:55:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I wouldn't mess with Hillary. Hey did you hear that Obama Osama is a smoker? How cool is that, I thought Libs hate smokers.
2007-01-18 11:52:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If obama's campaign gains traction, I expect him to suffer a serious "accident" courtesy of Hillary. I expect a lot of candidates to suffer "accidents".
2007-01-18 12:06:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
easily, the in common words concern it truly is somewhat prevented any further terrorist attacks on American soil is international cooperation and the sharing of intelligence. One staggering get jointly were the foiled attacks on airliners in Britain. fatherland safe practices, as a federal branch, has no longer somewhat more advantageous communications between the CIA, FBI and NSA almost as a lot because it desires to - somewhat, made the total affair a more effective bloated federal procedure. in the interim, maximum of our protection money bypass to the conflict in Iraq, somewhat than in direction of further safe practices infrastructure at living house. yet another president might want to (a) be more effective palatable to our international intelligence companions (although, granted, the Europeans in many cases cooperate in basic terms an same, regardless of their court docket cases), and (b) launch protection elements and manpower by technique of transferring attitude in Iraq, and eliminating our infantrymen from that suicide-bomber production facility that became once a contained probability. no longer to point, we may have a President with adequate clout and help to easily bypass law, and by no ability only veto that which he does no longer help. the only concern i will grant you with is the unlawful wiretapping. that is demanding to argue the smart aspects. nonetheless, yet another President may have executed an same by technique of alternative ability (or a minimum of no longer are turning out to be stuck).
2016-10-15 10:26:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right! Barrack Obama used drugs????
Good thing Bush or Clinton never used drugs, because that would have made them bad presidents.
Thats sarcasm - face it, PEOPLE use drugs! Get over it. Bush did. Clinton did.
2007-01-18 11:52:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Summer 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'd rather have a candidate who'd made mistakes in the past by using drugs and redeemed himself than one who's a chronic idiot. and "osama obama" is a very unintelligent and unclassy way to bring down a brilliant man and a very valid candidate.
2007-01-18 11:54:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by jamie b 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think Obama is setting himself up to be a VP candidate. Personally, I don't think he has enough experience to be President.
2007-01-18 11:53:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Darren 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ask him not this group
Go big Red Go
2007-01-18 11:51:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yea, sides i think hilary is going to win
2007-01-18 11:51:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋