English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Matter is neither created nor destroyed
When we die we still exist just in different form
We are the same matter as was 15 billion years ago just structured differently
Life is a cycle... No life is insignificant
Humans are at the top or rather end of the cycle which starts with the simplest forms of life.
You do not follow a defined path of reincarnation but rather a tree like network floating to different possibilities/outcomes depending on some independent unknown variable
No one animal or organism is better then the next. Order is not in a sequential hierarchy
The only order is the end points
The simplest of matter being the atom, simplest form of life a single celled organism and most complex: Homo Sapien, Sapiens

We seek out complex answers to fundamental questions but here, we are mistaken

The right answer is often the simplest…We only need look to the other examples of natural being to resolve our questions.

Nature is cyclical in all circumstances, why should we be any different. We are not an exception to the rule or laws of physics

It is factual that matter is neither crated nor destroyed. Then why believe that we are not part of what was and is to be.

It seems quiet elementary to me

2007-01-18 09:27:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

12 answers

Your interpretation of the inevitable comforts me. I want to believe and I have had some signs that it is as you describe but I still question.

2007-01-18 09:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by madisonian51 4 · 0 0

Ok I understand where you are coming from but, you are merely reciting a philosophy with a little bit of physics theories thrown in. Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps human kind has developed beliefs, religion for the need to give purpose to existence. I know that humans are lucky to question their existence, that they have the brain capacity to formulate thoughts, questions, ideas, and all of that other good stuff but why must you put in such a condensed version that does not give it justice. Besides can man be sure of anything outside of their own mind?

2007-01-19 00:27:23 · answer #2 · answered by lexy 2 · 0 0

Even if Christian religion doesn`t recognize it ( and I feel extreme respect for Christianism , which rules my entire life ), I know and I feel reincarnation is a reality - an universal law . It is the most logical and complete explanation for the basic " inequalties " among people been noticed since birth,and offers the most "fair " way to the spiritual evolution : slowly , from a life to another, not being damned for a single one . Edgar Cayce himself , very good Christian , agreed to it . However , there`s not its existance that matters, but the way we live our lives - be them one or more .

2007-01-18 19:15:54 · answer #3 · answered by Florina R . 2 · 0 0

All theories concerning an afterlife are, necessarily, speculation. Whatever, if it makes you feel better, go for it, but please don't be surprised when other people note that there is no proof of incarnation or any afterlife. I know it's tempting to try to imagine some of the members of the Religious Reich returning as RATS or COCKROACHES!

To my naturalistic rationalist way of thinking, we're all apprentices for wormfood. It's an optimistic view. When you're dead you should have figured out what you wanted to do in life and have done some of it.

Rev. Art - Atheologian

2007-01-18 17:39:45 · answer #4 · answered by revart42 2 · 0 0

As far as I know I sometimes think we are reincarnated yeah there isn't any evidence but what about Da Jaa vu or whatever how you spell it, I think we are reincarnated as ourselves again, its funny to think that way but I feel if we just became who we are again ya know like a billion years later the earth explodes and all those molecules chemical reaction thingy still exist somewhere and stuff ya know, well this is just what think you can disagree with me no one is asking anyone to say I'm wrong and of course my theory can't be right either because its just my opinion.

2007-01-18 17:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by Element 4 · 0 0

Matter being neither created nor destroyed is not evidence for reincarnation. The matter has not been lost if you aren't reincarnated, just changed into forms (e.g. complex compounds becoming other compounds or elements again).

2007-01-18 17:35:14 · answer #6 · answered by Older&Wiser 5 · 0 0

None of that makes any sense. You are referring to matter. Your soul is not matter. You are taking physical laws and applying them to spiritual things. Reincarnation is a bunch of nonsense. It was made up by people from India who were smoking too much of that Nirvana weed. When you die, you go to Heaven or Hell, based on your belief in Jesus Christ alone. You actions have nothing to do with it, and there is no reincarnation. That's it. You, my friend, are an idiot.

2007-01-18 18:06:01 · answer #7 · answered by ripkenfan86 2 · 0 1

The afterlife is just a presumption and thus waving scientific facts about in the name of new age bullcrap (no offense to Buddhism) is ludicrous. It's like those whack jobs who try to justify "Chaos Magick" with quantum theory.

2007-01-18 19:43:23 · answer #8 · answered by Smokey 2 · 0 0

Your thesis depends on what you mean by "we". You wrote "When we die we still exist..." Do we? Sure our matter still exists, albeit in another form, but are we only composed of matter?

What of our consciousness? Doesn't it perish without the governance of neuro-physiological mechanisms?

Your statements do fall in line with Monism.

2007-01-18 17:36:15 · answer #9 · answered by Unconvincable 3 · 0 0

That's an interesting ay of rationalizing it , and I think maybe everyone goes through this step in the process of accepting one's philosophies and beliefs.

2007-01-18 17:37:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers