I have heard they put their head in the sand. Maybe Australia could spare some to prove the US did the right thing by invading.
2007-01-18 09:24:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Great question.. now that has made me laugh. I am even prepared to sponsor one so that the cost can be evenly shared out. Keep up the good work, it's called the head in the sand syndrome.
2007-01-18 09:29:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In May 2003, coalition forces visited the former yellowcake extraction plant at Al-Qaim and discovered 16 drums of yellowcake and radioactive waste—materials we believe were associated with the pre-1991 nuclear weapons program. These drums were transferred in late June 2003 to the yellowcake storage facility located at Tuwaitha. There is no evidence that this material had been produced after Desert Storm
ISG also investigated the Ibn-Sina’ Facility—which in 1991 was part of Iraq’s EMIS uranium enrichment program—but found no indicators that the chemical processes being developed there had produced more than a few kilograms of uranium-bearing wastes as a byproduct of phosphoric acid purification. ISG believes that the Ibn-Sina’—which concentrated much of the chemical engineering staff from the former PC-3 nuclear weapons program—would most likely have been involved in an effort to reestablish a uranium recovery capability, had such an effort been under way.
2007-01-18 09:37:33 · answer #2 · answered by nick w 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well if you did that then the animal activists would be up in arms with the president saying we have to stay the course. This then will hit the papers where society can disspell the true atrocities of dolphins getting caught in the nets of whale hunters so Bumble be tuna can inadvertently finance the next wave of Ostriches being deployed.
We also then have to worry about the gophers who think they are better equipped for the mission and stage a coupe to overthrow the government because they feel they are being suppressed.
2007-01-18 09:44:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
300,000 ostriches to Iraq? It's a moot point because everyone knows that Neocons don't enlist.
2007-01-18 09:51:32 · answer #4 · answered by fake_cowboy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is a good idea. I am sure you could use the company. SUre must get lonely with your head in the sand that way.
2007-01-18 10:19:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe since they put the heads in the ground.
2007-01-18 09:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by us5we2 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. They're buried deeper than that. Ostriches would act like liberals and not 'see' anything anyway or deny they did see them when they found them.
2007-01-18 09:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you should send Dr. Ruth instead.
2007-01-18 09:28:26 · answer #8 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you go to Iraq and help find them?
2007-01-18 09:29:16 · answer #9 · answered by B aka PE 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
they would be killed by friendly fire...you know when Cheney pulls up in the limo.
2007-01-18 09:30:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋