This was not about damage, this was about spectacular show of hitting something the US takes Pride in. You need to open your pea brain just a tad more.
2007-01-18 09:07:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
8⤋
They say that if Flight 93 that went down in Pennsylvania on 9/11 had hit the Three Mile Island reactor it would have rendered much of the Northeast uninhabitable for generations. I'm not convinced that TMI wasn't the terrorist's target. Why were they flying so low on a direct path 15 minutes from the reactor before the passengers supposedly took down United Flight 93?
2016-05-24 04:30:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This puts us conspiracy theorists to shame :( To think that missing a small target like a nuke plant thats low to the ground vs a large target thats high in the air was a mistake is ignorance. The Gov may have been behind 9/11 but this is far from proof that they were... The best proof I have heard is the fact that the Gov was running multiple tests of the defence system that made it impossible for the planes to be targeted and shot down in time. To think 4 planes could be hijacked and no one in the defence agency notice enoth to be able to launch some time of ground to air missle at them is retarded... Also I think the terrorist could have picked a much better target then the heavly built pentagon but that proves nothing also.
2007-01-18 09:55:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by magpiesmn 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The WTC is a lot easier of a target, and would potentially cause many more immediate deaths. They were shooting for 20-50,000.
A nuclear power station is a tough target. Not only is the nuclear core extremely well encased in steel, lead, concrete... layer upon layer, but the nuclear section is rather small. Those big cooling towers that you see are just that- big cooling towers (like smoke stacks). Hitting them would just shut down the station and not release any radiation. They'd just be flying a jet into a wall of cement- if they could even hit it.
No- the terrorists chose wisely, if not simply.
2007-01-18 09:20:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Morey000 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
THAT WAS A SMALL TARGET COMPARED TO THE TOWERS. THE TOWERS ARE A STATEMENT TO THE WORLD THAT THEY COULD HIT OUR FINANCIAL MIGHT. A PLANE AT A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT MIGHT DO ALLOT OF DAMAGE BUT IT WOULD HAVE TO HIT THE MAIN REACTOR. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHICH BUILDING HOLDS THE MAIN REACTOR YOU WILL DO NOTHING. THE BUILDINGS ARE ALSO DESIGNED TO WITH STAND AN IMPACT. IF THEY KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT REACTORS AND NUKES THEY WOULD HAVE BUILT ONE ALREADY. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THIS ATTACK WAS DONE BY TERRORIST WORKING FOR AL QUEDA. IF ANY BODY ELSE BELIEVES DIFFERENT THEY NEED TO RE-EVALUATE WHAT THEY KNOW. IT' S SO EASY TO GO AGAINST THE COUNTRY YOU LIVE IN BUT LET THESE MORAN'S GO TO ANOTHER COUNTRY AND SEE WHAT THE WORLD REALLY LOOKS LIKE. WHAT THE PEOPLE OF OTHER COUNTRIES REALLY THINK ABOUT THE USA. THEY WILL KNOW THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE CAPABLE OF THIS ATROCITY AND MUCH MORE.
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS DESTROYED BY TERRORIST . ISLAMIC EXTREMIST. TO BELIEVE OTHERWISE IS TO AGREE WITH THE EVIL THESE PEOPLE DO. IT SEEM THAT IT IS MUCH EASIER FOR SOME PEOPLE TO SLANDER THE COUNTRY THAT HAS PROVIDED THEIR LIVES THEN TO STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR THE COUNTRY THAT HAS PROVIDED FOR THEM. COWARDS AND TRAITORS THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE. THE MAJORITY JUST SAY IT BECAUSE THEY HEAR SOME ONE ELSE SAY. BLIND MONKEYS HATERS OF AMERICA YOU SHALL ALSO PERISH.
2007-01-18 09:27:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by strike_eagle29 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
TRUTH IS SIMPLE
BEING BRAINWASHED U WILL NEVER ACCEPT THE TRUTH
HERE ARE FACTS
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_summary.htm
MORE FACTS
http://www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/
OSAMA DENIES 9/11 ATTACK
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_facts.html
HOW MUCH PROOF DO PEOPLE NEED
2007-01-20 06:42:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by TYPE X 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
They attacked twice that day. The terrorists want to disrupt the world's finances with terror attacks aimed at that purpose and the United States because we are world leaders in finance. It was the WORLD Trade Center, not the United States Trade Center! Cutting a little power would have negligible effects for terrorism's purpose in this country, but it has a big effect in Iraq.
2007-01-18 09:16:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
The WTC was a symbol. It was more important to the terrorists to destroy that symbol then to attack a nuclear power plant. To put the question another way, why have they NEVER attacked a nuclear power plant anywhere, not just 9/11?
2007-01-18 09:11:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by diogenese19348 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
Crashing into a nuke plant would only kill the workers on duty and the occupants of the planes. It would not crack the containment dome. Bin-Laden knew this. He was in the construction business. And they have many engineers at their disposal, these were not stupid people.
Containment domes were designed and tested to withstand a plane crash. This is well documented and the terrorists did their homework
2007-01-18 09:20:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by DylisTN 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
The nuclear power station containment was designed to withstand an impact from a plane flown into it. The reactor would be shut down and emergency cooling initiated.
I do not see how this could possibly kill millions.
2007-01-18 09:15:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by 63vette 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Moltar, many people say the terrorists were geniuses. They must be if they can pull off what they did on 9/11 from a cave. All that planning, strategy, communication, intelligence, flight training, etc...They were obviously smarter than the United States that day...if you believe the official story.
2007-01-18 09:26:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
2⤊
3⤋