That is pregnant women that were killed with their babies inside them.
2007-01-18 08:58:01 · 15 answers · asked by John16 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes!
2007-01-18 09:05:28 · answer #1 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. According to the 14th Amendment, people aren't recognized by the federal government until BIRTH. If you start counting fetuses as people as of conception, you have to give rights to anyone CONCEIVED within the borders, not just those BORN within them.
2007-01-18 09:26:27 · answer #2 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. After all, Scott Peterson was tried for both Lacy's, and her unborn baby's deaths. The Libs won't see it that way though. They'd rather give aide to the terrorist's families that flew the planes into the buildings. Go figure.
2007-01-18 09:12:46 · answer #3 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No that is the dumbest thing I have heard regarding 9-11.
2007-01-18 09:05:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
It depends on how pregnant they were at the time. If you miscarry before a certain time. It's just considered a miscarriage. No funeral needed. However if your over 4 months ago and have a miscarriage then normally then the baby is buried.
2007-01-18 09:04:54 · answer #5 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No because they are not babies until they are born breathing and alive
2007-01-18 19:20:31 · answer #6 · answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have to be born, to be a person, to be a casualty.
2007-01-18 09:28:47 · answer #7 · answered by LindaAnn 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That has got to be the goofy est thing I ever heard. What about the thousands of children that might have been born?
2007-01-18 09:06:33 · answer #8 · answered by bubu 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes.
2007-01-18 09:02:12 · answer #9 · answered by Gustav 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, but the liberal agenda won't recognize unborn life because it will show that abortion is murder against an unborn victim.
2007-01-18 09:03:01 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋