2007-01-18 08:49:27 · 15 answers · asked by poopfairy 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
that sucks. It's amazing how much power and control they have over you people. I'd rally up a couple hundred smokers to go smoke outside. HAHA.
2007-01-18 09:52:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? because the voters voted on a proposal and it passed. While I am a smoker, I appreciate how those who do not have perhaps had enough and the timing was just about right for such a proposal, that is, more people have quit and there are more non-smokers than smokers.
With respect to their legality, there are many many products sold legally that can not be used in public.
I'm not so sure about following the money on this one, if anything these actions may discourage people from smoking thus lowering the overall income from cigarette tax.
2007-01-18 08:57:20 · answer #2 · answered by Tim H 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
the sell of cigarettes pays for 1/2 of the browns, bengals, cav's and indians home stadiums plus e-check, some art museums and others things we don;t know about. it pays the department of lies and smoke haters millions of dollars a year to lie to the people that 2nd hand smoke will kill you. if they would give my business millions of dollars a year, i;ll make you believe the world is flat.
you don;t see them trying to stop the sell of cigarettes.
just where you can smoke them.
if you buy them, they will keep there bmw's
2007-01-18 11:05:15 · answer #3 · answered by Michael B 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
procuring guns/rifles and ammunition in carrying products shops or Wal-Marts is criminal. yet you could't have the expectancy of operating round your city or community capturing in public places with pedestrians round do you? you're taking it to managed capturing degrees or be approved to apply them for searching faraway from residential / city factors. you should save in recommendations well being and questions of protection. it truly is criminal topersistent a motor vehicle in massive apple, and it is also criminal to have and talk on a cellular telephone - yet no longer at the same time. you're distracted and a plausible protection hazzard. it would want to properly be a similar for fat those who use McDonaldspersistent-via - I see them without hands on the wheel of a motor vehicle driving even as attempting to apply a ketchup packet on those addicting french fries and Quarter pounder burgers (what do they lace them with?) I see unmarried homely women folk utilising way too a lot makeup even as driving on an parkway, heavily staring into the rear view reflect, really than the line ahead. I see nerds interpreting newpapers, books, artwork comments, maps, etc even as driving in site visitors really of the line
2016-11-25 01:58:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same goes for condoms, alcohol, dildos. Legal to make & sell, illegal to use in public. Go figure.
2007-01-18 08:53:24 · answer #5 · answered by sjersee 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
because the people that made the law and enforce it out number the people that want to smoke in public and oppose that law
2007-01-18 08:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Communism thrusting it's ugly head into private lives.
2007-01-18 08:55:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
God forbid you should get smoke on a liberals clothes they might die or something.
2007-01-18 09:05:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's ok to buy them it's just not ok to smoke them.
2007-01-18 08:54:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
cuz a buncha redneck inbreds from ohio made those laws...
2007-01-18 08:56:38 · answer #10 · answered by wheeliemasta 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋