2007-01-18 08:45:15 · 4 answers · asked by leandroownsyou 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear
360 simply put becasue of the games, the ps2 has more usually but most of them are dumb games.
2007-01-18 10:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say it is definitely a good console but just not worth the money. The 360 will give you graphics just as good as those on PS3 and the reason being is despite blu-ray having more space, you also have less RAM in which 360 has plenty of and b/c of the memory available the 360 produces graphics just as good as PS3 for a lesser price. The blu-ray DVD player that is built into the PS3 is a low end player so it is not like we're really getting a great deal for the money they're asking.
2007-01-18 09:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think the PS3 is just a cheap Blu-ray DVD player. the 360 has many more options, and better games in my opinion.
2007-01-18 09:26:07 · answer #3 · answered by ut_texas_17 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its all in your personal preferance but me personally don't see a difference in graphics. I mean my friend has a PS3(too expensive for me right now) and i have a 360 and i see no difference in graphics.Right now it just comes down to how much money your willing to spend and what games you prefer such as Resistance for the playstation line and Gears of War for the 360 side
2007-01-18 09:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by firefighter9292 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋