Your question is?
2007-01-18 08:38:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think you asking why use Sterilized needles for LETHAL INJECTION?
It's not like an infection is gunna kill him...!
2007-01-18 08:40:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by SteelerFan_2006_ 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Skip the needles... Kill 'em the same way they did their victims. If they used sterilized needles on them, then they can have them too. However, I think most would just end up with a bullet in their head or a knife in their gut !!!!
2007-01-18 08:45:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by pritigrl 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep, only in America would they make sure the condemmed doesn't get an infection before they get injected with drugs that will kill them.
2007-01-18 08:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You need sterilized needles for everything because when the coroner does their report...you want to know that they died from the lethan injection and not by bacteria...you want it done right the first time dont you? lol
2007-01-18 08:39:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jujuchi 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
There could always be a pardon, or stay, while the saline (but not the poison) is already flowing through the prisoner's veins.
2007-01-18 08:39:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
why not add to the lawsuit industry for using an unsteril needle
2007-01-18 10:54:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by nickle 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know, what a joke, uh?
When I heard the controversy about that I almost cut my own head off....
2007-01-18 08:56:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dog Lover 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Even more bizarre to me than that concept is getting a sick inmate on death row well so that they can then be executed.
2007-01-18 08:42:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rosebudd 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I hope their dirty ones they found on the Whitehouse lawn.
2007-01-18 08:39:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
quite an oxymoron until you consider the alternative.
2007-01-18 08:41:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by jj raider 4
·
0⤊
1⤋